Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Have Made Bank On the Speaking Circuit. They Aren’t the Only Ones.
Just a single speech from Snoop Dogg, Jon Stewart, or Jodie Foster could rake in more than $50,000.
Illustrations by Alex Kuehne
Sightlines: Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Have Made Bank On the Speaking Circuit. They Aren’t the Only Ones.
By Katie Peek
Illustrations by Alex Kuehne
Before battling on the campaign trail, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump shared common ground on a different circuit: high-paid public speaking. Clinton has earned more than $200,000 per speech, while Trump has reportedly commanded as much as $1.5 million.
Big names — including celebrities like Lady Gaga and Larry the Cable Guy — are one elite slice of a booming business, which grew after World War II as the meetings industry spread across America. Today, more than 100 agencies broker agreements between event organizers and speakers or their representatives, taking a 10 to 35 percent cut of the fee.
The industry doesn’t keep comprehensive data, but Marie Fredette of the International Association of Speakers Bureaus says business is rebounding post-recession. A 2013 survey of 175 organizations by professional development advisories Tagoras and Velvet Chainsaw Consulting found that respondents hired an average of 15 speakers annually, up from 11 two years prior; one-fifth had speaker budgets topping $100,000.
To peek into this world, Foreign Policy analyzed data compiled by the All American Speakers Bureau, a talent aggregator. It shows that a few keynote addresses are all it could take for one to jump into a new tax bracket.
$200K+
(SWIPE LEFT/RIGHT)
$100K+
(SWIPE LEFT/RIGHT)
$50K+
(SWIPE LEFT/RIGHT)
$30K-$50K
(SWIPE LEFT/RIGHT)
$20K-$30K
(SWIPE LEFT/RIGHT)
$10K-$20K
(SWIPE LEFT/RIGHT)
$5K-$10K
(SWIPE LEFT/RIGHT)
Click here to view the complete chart.
A version of this article originally appeared in the September/October 2016 issue of FP magazine under the title, “Keynote Cosmos.”
Katie Peek is is a science journalist and information graphics designer. Formerly an astrophysicist, her recent work has appeared in Popular Science and Scientific American.
Your guide to the most important world stories of the day. Delivered Monday-Friday.
Essential analysis of the stories shaping geopolitics on the continent. Delivered Wednesday.
One-stop digest of politics, economics, and culture. Delivered Friday.
The latest news, analysis, and data from the country each week. Delivered Wednesday.
Weekly update on developments in India and its neighbors. Delivered Thursday.
Weekly update on what’s driving U.S. national security policy. Delivered Thursday.
A curated selection of our very best long reads. Delivered Wednesday & Sunday.
Evening roundup with our editors’ favorite stories of the day. Delivered Monday-Saturday.
A monthly digest of the top articles read by FP subscribers.
Every year, the top Chinese legislative and advisory bodies meet for two weeks to rubber-stamp decisions already made by the Chinese Communist Party. It’s called the “two sessions,” an...Show mored it began on March 4. This year’s meeting was the first since the end of zero-COVID restrictions, and was also an opportunity to get an inside look into the Chinese leadership’s fears and priorities. Beyond the headlines, what can the world expect from the convening? What will it mean for China’s economy, defense budget, and foreign policy? Join FP’s Ravi Agrawal in conversation with a panel of China experts as they decipher the news from Beijing: Ryan Hass is the former China director at the National Security Council under President Barack Obama and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, Zongyuan Zoe Liu is an FP columnist and fellow for international political economy at the Council on Foreign Relations, and James Palmer is a deputy editor at Foreign Policy and the author of the magazine’s China Brief newsletter.
Over the last few years, Washington has prioritized relocating manufacturing production back to the United States. Critics abroad argue that America’s new industrial policy is protectionis...Show moret and fosters unfair competition. Economist Adam Posen goes a step further. He says the problem with U.S. policy isn’t just that it channels zero-sum thinking but that it is destined to backfire on a number of its goals, from job creation to innovation and decarbonization. Posen argues that for U.S. industrial policy to be successful and resilient, it needs to be barrier free. How and why? Subscribers are encouraged to send in their questions. Posen will discuss his FP cover essay in a conversation with FP’s editor in chief, Ravi Agrawal.
Russia has gone from one mobilization to the next, burning through equipment and ammunition faster than it can replace it—even resorting to the recruitment of prisoners to fight its drawn-...Show moreout war in Ukraine. Meanwhile, Kyiv has received a major infusion of military aid from the West in the last three months. What are its chances of success in a forthcoming offensive? Join FP’s Ravi Agrawal for a discussion with James Stavridis, a retired four-star U.S. Navy admiral and NATO supreme allied commander. Tune in for a wide-ranging discussion on Russia and Ukraine’s military options; the respective roles of Europe, the United States, and China; and more.
The region once seemed a bright spot in the disorder unleashed by U.S. regime change. Today, things look bleak.
Biden spurned NATO allies that are dismantling their democracies.
Refugees are often portrayed as helpless victims — reporting on culture and cuisine is one way to tell the whole story.
Two philosophers discuss the morality of family planning in the age of climate change.