Gleick’s ‘Information’: The key problem with innovation is grasping differences
One of the key problems of innovation, James Gleick notes in The Information, is that new things tend to be seen too much in the context of the old.
One of the key problems of innovation, James Gleick notes in The Information, is that new things tend to be seen too much in the context of the old.
The danger of this is as a result of that context, the extent of change tends to be underestimated. In discussing how communications experts of the time greeted the telephone, for example, he notes that they saw it simply as “the talking telegraph.” That was true, as far as it goes, but it turns out that that wasn’t nearly far enough.
This was, Gleick writes, perhaps a bit harshly on us humans, “the usual failure of imagination in the face of a radically new technology.”
One of the key problems of innovation, James Gleick notes in The Information, is that new things tend to be seen too much in the context of the old.
The danger of this is as a result of that context, the extent of change tends to be underestimated. In discussing how communications experts of the time greeted the telephone, for example, he notes that they saw it simply as “the talking telegraph.” That was true, as far as it goes, but it turns out that that wasn’t nearly far enough.
This was, Gleick writes, perhaps a bit harshly on us humans, “the usual failure of imagination in the face of a radically new technology.”
What was the experts’ specific failure? Gleick is quite clear about this. The experts saw the ways in which the telephone was similar to the telegraph, but failed to understand how it was in other ways quite different.
“The telegraph demanded literacy; the telephone embraced orality. A message sent by telegraph had first to be written, encoded, and tapped out by a trained intermediary. To employ the telephone, one just talked. A child could use it.” All that may not have mattered to experts who already were tech-savvy, literate and adult, but it sure changed life for many others.
Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons
More from Foreign Policy
Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.
So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.
Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.
Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
