Best Defense

Thomas E. Ricks' daily take on national security.

‘Proceedings’ spanks the Navy’s ship drivers for a culture that hides mistakes

In the January issue of the resurgent "Proceedings," a retired Navy captain calls out the service’s “surface warfare community” (that is, those who drive ships), alleging that it has a culture that downplays mistakes.

160310-N-MD297-161 
PACIFIC OCEAN (March 10, 2016) The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Lassen (DDG 82) patrols the eastern Pacific Ocean. Lassen is currently underway in support of Operation Martillo, a joint operation with the U.S. Coast Guard and partner nations within the 4th Fleet area of responsibility. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Huey D. Younger Jr./Not Released)
160310-N-MD297-161 PACIFIC OCEAN (March 10, 2016) The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Lassen (DDG 82) patrols the eastern Pacific Ocean. Lassen is currently underway in support of Operation Martillo, a joint operation with the U.S. Coast Guard and partner nations within the 4th Fleet area of responsibility. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Huey D. Younger Jr./Not Released)
160310-N-MD297-161 PACIFIC OCEAN (March 10, 2016) The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Lassen (DDG 82) patrols the eastern Pacific Ocean. Lassen is currently underway in support of Operation Martillo, a joint operation with the U.S. Coast Guard and partner nations within the 4th Fleet area of responsibility. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Huey D. Younger Jr./Not Released)

In the January issue of the resurgent Proceedings, a retired Navy captain calls out the service’s “surface warfare community” (that is, those who drive ships), alleging that it has a culture that downplays mistakes. “95 percent of lower level mishaps go unreported,” he writes. “Why is that? I submit that the surface warfare community — unlike the aviation and submarine communities — has a culture where lessons are kept within the lifelines whenever possible. Surface warriors do not like to admit mistakes or shortcomings, much less make formal reports of mishaps or damage that fall below the reportable threshold.”

In the January issue of the resurgent Proceedings, a retired Navy captain calls out the service’s “surface warfare community” (that is, those who drive ships), alleging that it has a culture that downplays mistakes. “95 percent of lower level mishaps go unreported,” he writes. “Why is that? I submit that the surface warfare community — unlike the aviation and submarine communities — has a culture where lessons are kept within the lifelines whenever possible. Surface warriors do not like to admit mistakes or shortcomings, much less make formal reports of mishaps or damage that fall below the reportable threshold.”

In a sidebar, the author recommends that surface leaders imitate the aviation community and put out a magazine like Approach, published by and for Navy and Marine aviators. I’d never read it, so I went to the site, only to read that, “Approach Magazine’s final issue will be published in February 2017.” I asked the editor about that, and she replied, “As with many publications we are taking the magazine digital. It’s part budget, but mostly a sign of the times and we feel we can reach a larger audience by combining all four magazines and creating a new digital version. The new version will be available for download at the end of March. I agree with what Proceedings says and follow the example. Our magazines will still cover many of the same topics and will contain features all related to safety.”

By the way, there is a theme running through January’s Proceedings: the idea that micromanagement is killing the Navy, especially in surface warfare. The next article in the issue is a cri de coeur from a lieutenant (j.g.) who concludes that, “Micromanaging in combat leads to lost battles and wars.” Later there is a group interview with former SWIFT boat commanders who observe that, “when command-and-control becomes top-heavy, it can lead to disaster.”

Photo credit: Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Huey D. Younger Jr./U.S. Navy

Thomas E. Ricks covered the U.S. military from 1991 to 2008 for the Wall Street Journal and then the Washington Post. He can be reached at ricksblogcomment@gmail.com. Twitter: @tomricks1

More from Foreign Policy

Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.
Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America

The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.
Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense

If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.
Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War

Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.
An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests

And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.