Michael Flynn Finds Defenders. In Russia.
The former national security advisor has few friends in Washington, but plenty, for now, in Moscow.
Late Monday, National Security Advisor Michael Flynn resigned after inaccurately describing his December conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak. That’s prompted some top lawmakers to further question the relationship between the Trump administration and Russia, and left Flynn high and dry.
Late Monday, National Security Advisor Michael Flynn resigned after inaccurately describing his December conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak. That’s prompted some top lawmakers to further question the relationship between the Trump administration and Russia, and left Flynn high and dry.
On Tuesday, with Washington wondering what — and who — comes next for the National Security Council, Russia reacted to Flynn’s resignation with a mix of feigned disinterest and open displeasure.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov refused to comment on Flynn’s resignation. He did note that it is “too early to say” whether the Kremlin still hopes for an improvement in U.S.-Russian relations, given that “Trump’s team has not been shaped yet.”
Other Russian politicians, however, had more to say. Russian lawmaker Alexei Pushkov tweeted that Flynn resigned not because of a mistake, but because of an aggressive campaign against him. “Paranoia and a witch hunt,” he added. His colleague Konstantin Kosachev posted on Facebook, “Even readiness for dialogue with Russians is perceived by hawks in Washington as thoughtcrime (in the words of immortal George Orwell).” And the chairman of the State Duma’s foreign relations committee, Leonid Slutsky, called Flynn’s resignation a “negative signal” for U.S. Russian relations.
Russian state media was firmer still in its condemnation of Flynn’s self-inflicted ouster. Russian state-sponsored outlet RT published a piece blaming the mainstream American media. Russian news agency RIA Novosti put forth an article extrapolating on WikiLeaks’s explanation — namely, that this is all part of a destabilization campaign conducted among spies, the Democratic Party, and the press.
Russian state-sponsored site Sputnik took a different tack. “Flynn’s resignation will prompt Russia to think twice before trusting Washington and holding confidential talks on sensitive bilateral and international issues,” citing Vladimir Batyuk of the Moscow-based Center for U.S. and Canadian Studies.
In reality, Kislyak was not speaking with “Washington” during his December conversations with Flynn; the Obama administration was still in office. Nevertheless, Batyuk “did not rule out that Flynn’s exit may lead to a situation when the Russian side will be wary of contacts with representatives of the Trump Administration.”
The Kremlin openly cheered Trump’s election victory, hoping for a more constructive relationship than it had with Obama. Flynn’s willingness to work with Moscow made that seem more likely. But with Flynn out, and questions swirling over Trump’s intentions toward Moscow, Russia may end up regretting it.
Photo credit: Mario Tama/Getty Images
Emily Tamkin is a global affairs journalist and the author of The Influence of Soros and Bad Jews. Twitter: @emilyctamkin
More from Foreign Policy

Russians Are Unraveling Before Our Eyes
A wave of fresh humiliations has the Kremlin struggling to control the narrative.

A BRICS Currency Could Shake the Dollar’s Dominance
De-dollarization’s moment might finally be here.

Is Netflix’s ‘The Diplomat’ Factual or Farcical?
A former U.S. ambassador, an Iran expert, a Libya expert, and a former U.K. Conservative Party advisor weigh in.

The Battle for Eurasia
China, Russia, and their autocratic friends are leading another epic clash over the world’s largest landmass.