Hey MC Gazette! Pointing out a problem is a different exercise than fixing a problem — but still a valuable contribution
The people who run the organization may be in a position to fix problems — but first they need to know there is a problem.
Pointing out a problem is a different task than solving a problem, but it is still a valuable contribution.
I mention this because I often seen an ad hominem response to critics in the U.S. military: Hey, don’t just gripe, tell us how to solve it.
What that retort ignores is that the two things are very different. The people who run the organization may be in a position to fix problems — but first they need to know there is a problem. And the people who see the problem may be junior people out in the field. Consider, for example, the problem the Navy had with its torpedoes early in World War II.
Pointing out a problem is a different task than solving a problem, but it is still a valuable contribution.
I mention this because I often seen an ad hominem response to critics in the U.S. military: Hey, don’t just gripe, tell us how to solve it.
What that retort ignores is that the two things are very different. The people who run the organization may be in a position to fix problems — but first they need to know there is a problem. And the people who see the problem may be junior people out in the field. Consider, for example, the problem the Navy had with its torpedoes early in World War II.
I mention all this because Capt. Joshua Waddell gets spanked in the April issue of the Marine Corps Gazette for the criticism he directed at the Corps’ leaders in an earlier article. In that cri de coeur, he charged that the Corps isn’t as good as it should be, that its leaders haven’t faced some strategic realities, that its expeditionary communications aren’t as good as the Army’s, and that it gives lip service to innovation but often stifles it.
In the Gazette’s April issue, there is a screedy article in response. I didn’t think much of it and will let it be, except to point out that JAGs seem to have led the way in telling Waddell, a infantry commander, to STFU. A letter to the editor also takes him to task. More significantly, there also is an editorial stating that, “Capt. Waddell’s article could have provided additional recommendations to solve the problems he identifies.”
I disagree, strongly. If he has solutions, make that a separate exercise. First, figure out if there really is a problem. A thorough diagnosis should precede prescription of remedies. Otherwise the posse may be galloping down the wrong trail.
Photo credit: U.S. Department of Defense
More from Foreign Policy
Lessons for the Next War
Twelve experts weigh in on how to prevent, deter, and—if necessary—fight the next conflict.
It’s High Time to Prepare for Russia’s Collapse
Not planning for the possibility of disintegration betrays a dangerous lack of imagination.
Turkey Is Sending Cold War-Era Cluster Bombs to Ukraine
The artillery-fired cluster munitions could be lethal to Russian troops—and Ukrainian civilians.
Congrats, You’re a Member of Congress. Now Listen Up.
Some brief foreign-policy advice for the newest members of the U.S. legislature.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
