Of leaks and such
You can never be entirely sure of the motivation of a government official leaking to you, even when they tell you why they are giving you the information.
You can never be entirely sure of the motivation of a government official leaking to you, even when they tell you why they are giving you the information.
But in my experience of 35 years of reporting, most of them in Washington, the majority of leaks seem not to be personal but professional. That is, an Air Force colonel in charge of one aspect of an acquisition program feels that a member of Congress is being unfair to that program because that member has in his district the headquarters of a competing firm that wanted the contract. But he doesn’t want to end his career by antagonizing that member. Or a congressional staffer feels that counter sea mine warfare is being stiffed in the defense budget (it always is) and gives you the documentation on the Navy’s painful shortfalls in that area.
You can never be entirely sure of the motivation of a government official leaking to you, even when they tell you why they are giving you the information.
But in my experience of 35 years of reporting, most of them in Washington, the majority of leaks seem not to be personal but professional. That is, an Air Force colonel in charge of one aspect of an acquisition program feels that a member of Congress is being unfair to that program because that member has in his district the headquarters of a competing firm that wanted the contract. But he doesn’t want to end his career by antagonizing that member. Or a congressional staffer feels that counter sea mine warfare is being stiffed in the defense budget (it always is) and gives you the documentation on the Navy’s painful shortfalls in that area.
My point is that most leaks are institutional in nature, not personal. The only time I can remember getting a lot of personal leaks was when Donald Rumsfeld was defense secretary. His heavy-handed manner and shoddy handling of the Iraq war antagonized a lot of senior officers. I was at the Washington Post at the time.
Late one afternoon at the Post, my desk phone rang. Picking up the receiver, I heard the voice of a general I knew. He was chuckling. “Hey Tom, I thought you’d like this,” he began. “You know what Rummy just said in the Tank at the end of the meeting? ‘And I DON’T want to read all this in tomorrow’s Washington Post.’”
I reached for my long reporter’s notebook and began to take notes.
Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons
More from Foreign Policy
Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.
So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.
Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.
Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
