Part One: Technology and Infrastructure
PUBLISHED: JAN. 22, 2020
UPDATED: JULY 20, 2020
The discussion surrounding the ongoing development of the fifth generation of cellular networks, or “5G,” has invoked intense anticipation, deep-seated fear, and general confusion. 5G has the power to be a transformative technology, but it is widely misunderstood. Barclays’ polling found that only 28 percent of businesses know what 5G is and what it could do. This gap creates a competitive advantage for companies that are better able to understand 5G and craft effective 5G strategies. In our 5G series, FP Analytics analyzes three distinct aspects of 5G: Technology and Infrastructure, The Global Competitive Landscape, and National Security, which are essential to fully understanding the evolving industry and the range of commercial and geopolitical implications.
This report was written by FP Analytics, the independent research division of Foreign Policy; access to the executive summary of 5G Explained is made possible with support from Nokia.
5G technology is set to revolutionize the internet as we know it. It will increase network speeds, enable the Internet of Things (IoT) by bringing billions of more devices online, and advance new technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning. Despite this transformative impact, the majority of businesses still do not know what 5G is and what it could do.
The “race to 5G” has been widely publicized (and state of development wildly embellished), but the fundamental issues and realities underpinning the transition to 5G technology are still widely misunderstood. Building 5G networks requires extensive global coordination among governments, private companies, and regulatory bodies. It is an ongoing process that will unfold over the next decade at different paces in different countries. As this process occurs, understanding the stages of 5G development in different markets and accurately timing investments will be crucial for businesses. 5G technology will bring broad benefits and widespread risks globally, but there will likely not be one clear-cut winner. Despite this, intense geopolitical competition surrounding 5G is developing, and the results of this competition will have long-lasting and far-reaching effects.
While innovation on 4G networks was largely dominated by the United States and other Western countries, since 2012, China has made a coordinated effort to dominate the build-out of 5G networks and determine operating standards around the world. Chinese omnipresence in 5G infrastructure rollout, embodied in its national telecommunications leader, Huawei, has raised security concerns for Western and other countries and has moved the 5G debate from the technical realm into geopolitics.
China’s push to lead in 5G infrastructure development, combined with long-running U.S. concerns over Huawei’s alleged intellectual property theft, prompted President Donald Trump’s signing an executive order banning Huawei from accessing U.S. supply chains in May 2019. The move sparked a direct confrontation between the U.S. and China over 5G, putting the two countries directly at odds over 5G technology platforms and forcing other countries to take sides. Without a direct competitor to Huawei, the U.S. has moved toward European and South Korean competitors Nokia, Ericsson, and Samsung, and it is strongly urging allies to do the same.
However, Huawei’s competitive position cannot easily be diminished. Huawei’s 2019 revenue was four times greater than Nokia’s or Ericsson’s, and it owns more patents on essential telecom technology than any of its competitors. Further, Huawei played an essential role in the development of 4G networks globally and has its equipment and services already deployed in 170 countries. Already, the majority of countries in Europe, Asia, Africa, and Latin America have begun working with Huawei to develop their 5G networks. For the U.S., unseating Huawei will be an uphill, if not insurmountable, battle.
In FP Analytics’ three-part Power Map Series, 5G Explained, we break down the key issues surrounding the development of 5G networks and the confrontation between the U.S. and China over 5G by:
- Identifying the key players in 5G technology and infrastructure development;
- Detailing the global competitive landscape, including issues along supply chains, influence on standards, and forces driving investment decisions in markets around the world;
- Pinpointing key national security concerns, many of which are currently going unaddressed;
- Breaking down the emerging geopolitical competition over 5G; and
- Cataloguing a range of risks and opportunities for businesses.
This FP Analytics Power Map provides the most comprehensive assessment of the issues surrounding 5G to date and provides critical 5G analysis across the technical, economic, geopolitical, and security realms. Beyond the hype and hyperbole, this comprehensive overview provides businesses with an indispensable tool to help better understand the risks and opportunities with 5G.
Subscribe to FP Insider below or contact us at email@example.com for full access to 5G Explained.
Strictly speaking, 5G is a set of technical ground rules that will define the workings of that cellular network, including the radio frequencies used and how various components like computer chips and antennas will handle radio signals and exchange data. However, the full scope of 5G networks will encompass governments, telecom providers, telecom equipment manufactures, and regulatory bodies. Rebuilding cellular networks to the 5G standard will increase speeds and reduce latency, enabling the “Internet of Things,” including Internet-connected household appliances, self-driving cars, smart infrastructure, and other devices that rely on high-speed Internet connectivity to operate and communicate. In short, it will further enable and accelerate the digitalization of economies globally.
While innovations on 4G networks were largely dominated by the U.S. and other Western countries, since 2012, China has made a coordinated effort to lead in building out 5G networks and setting operating standards around the world. Chinese omnipresence in 5G infrastructure rollout, embodied in its national telecom leader, Huawei, has raised security concerns for Western and other countries and has moved the 5G debate from the technical realm into geopolitics.
Despite popular rhetoric, the development of 5G technology is not a race that will have one clear winner. Instead, there will be a wide range of benefits and risks that will be distributed across companies, governments, and individuals. With the increasing digitalization of our economies, societies, and defense systems, the stakes could not be higher. To mitigate risks and capitalize on emerging opportunities, stakeholders need to understand the distinct components, the scope of 5G’s global impact, the potential roadblocks that may impede 5G’s development, and when and where it is strategic to engage. The key and nuanced elements of these issues are broken down in our series.
Laying the Groundwork: Foundational Aspects of 5G Technology and Infrastructure Equipment
Building 5G networks requires extensive physical infrastructure, both new and upgraded, that is currently being built, but there are only a small number of companies globally that are able to supply the necessary equipment to build these networks.
5G networks will increase data transmission speeds by up to 100x that of 4G networks
Construction of 5G networks will require an estimated investment of over $2.7 trillion globally in 2020 alone
Need for Speed
5G networks stand to increase data transmission speeds by up to 100x that of 4G, requiring a vastly more extensive physical radio access network (RAN) infrastructure than previous generations used. In order to reliably transmit data over high-frequency radio waves, 5G requires broad-based construction of small cell towers to be placed within 500 feet of each other, requiring capital investment from mobile providers across all network domains, including spectrum, RAN, transmission, and core telecommunications networks.
Near-Term Investment Requirements Immense
Building this network will require an estimated investment of over $2.7 trillion globally in 2020, which is expected to increase infrastructure capex by 20 to 50 percent per year, with costs varying considerably by market. These costs will be borne by telecom providers and governments seeking to capitalize on the digitalization of global economies it promises to enable.
What’s at Stake
Seeking a first-mover advantage, telecom providers are scrambling to be the first to lay the foundation for fully operational 5G networks and lock in market share. Global profits from 5G network infrastructure are forecast to be $4.2 billion in 2020 alone, according to Gartner. The potential to capitalize on these profits and influence subsequent operation on the system has led to an intense competition among global telecom equipment providers, the outcome of which will determine which companies and countries capture the greatest benefits and profits from 5G.
How 5G Networks Function
5G networks are complex ecosystems that will span the entire globe.
Click to see how they work
The infrastructure for wireless networks is constructed through two forms of physical infrastructure: a core network and a radio access network (RAN). The core network transports data and connects the various parts of the radio access network. Then, the radio access network connects wireless or satellite devices to the core network, acting as an in-between transmitter for data and end-user devices such as mobile phones and computers. While core networks are built in fixed facilities, RANs need to cover expansive geographic areas.
RANs will account for the majority of the increase in infrastructure investment, jumping from an estimated 62 percent of global telecom providers’ capex in 2018 to 86 percent in 2025, predominantly due to the need for 5G networks to build additional radio towers.
4G RANs connect end-user devices to telecom core networks through macro cell radio towers, which transmit data across low-frequency radio waves covering areas ranging from 22 to 45 miles, while 5G networks will transmit orders of magnitude greater data on top of 4G networks and will incorporate a wider range of radio spectrum frequencies. Given that high-frequency radio waves cannot travel through walls and only cover an area of two to four city blocks, telecom companies still need to build out thousands of additional macro cell towers and tens of thousands of small cell towers. Despite widespread media coverage suggesting that 5G is here, the reality is that this build-out is in the very early stages in most markets and will take years to implement.
Core Network Infrastructure
The core network is the backbone of a telecommunications network. It routes and transports data and connects the different parts of the radio access network. In 4G networks, the core network routes data primarily through hardware systems. In 5G, the majority of the core networks routing functions will be moved into a cloud-based software system.
Radio Access Network (RAN)
RANs are systems of radio cell towers that connect mobile devices to the physical telecommunications network. The RAN in 4G consists of larger macro cell towers that carry signals over long distances. 5G networks will consist of a denser, more complex network of macro cell and small cell radio towers that will carry signals over a wider range of radio frequencies.
The core network acts as the hub that directs data throughout the telecommunications network. The radio access network provides wide-ranging cellular coverage that allows devices to connect to the core network and allows data to be sent and received across the entire network.
Macro Cell Towers
Macro cell towers transmit lower-frequency radio waves. Lower-frequency waves can travel over long distances and through walls, allowing macro cell towers to be placed far apart from each other.
Small Cell Towers
Small cell towers transmit higher-frequency radio waves. Higher-frequency waves can only travel short distances and cannot penetrate walls. In order toreliably transmit data, small cell towers need to be placed in close proximity to each other.
Devices such as smart phones, computers, and other smart devices (such as machinery, or household appliances) generate data that is then transmitted through the telecommunications network via the RAN.
Rights to Operate Are Defining the Playing Field—Private vs. State-Owned Telecoms
Depending on the country, telecom companies are either private or state-owned. The varying structure of telecom companies across countries creates distinct challenges for rolling out 5G networks within and across different markets.
Coordination is Key
Operating telecom networks requires close coordination among governments, telecom network operators, telecom equipment providers, and regulatory bodies. These actors must work together, often times across national borders, to build functioning 5G networks. Due to the scope of actors involved and their conflicting interests, 5G has the potential to create wide-ranging tensions. Countries that are better able to coordinate among these stakeholders have a clear advantage.
Telecoms’ Operating Structures Matter
Vastly different operating structures by country will largely determine the ability of key actors to coordinate. For state-owned telecoms, the directives and incentives are aligned by nature, while privately owned companies need to reconcile conflicting interests as they work toward 5G.
What’s at Stake
The ability to secure exclusive rights to operate will determine the rate at which development will be achieved—carrying implications for whether, when, and how companies and their competitors can participate in development. In each market, both the scope of infrastructure needed and the pace will vary; for 5G stakeholders, this means navigating uneven landscapes across markets and requires a tailored strategy for engagement.
Telecom Structure and Why It Matters
The distinction between private and state-owned telecom operators is a key determinant for the speed at which a country can roll out its 5G networks.
Click to learn why
5G RANs require extensive infrastructure to operate, with the International Data Corporation (IDC) estimating that over 2 million small cell transmitters will need to be built by 2021 for 5G in the U.S. alone, compared to only 200,000 total cell towers for past generations. To build out physical network systems, a telecom company must first secure the rights to exclusively operate on a specific frequency of radio spectrum. At the national level, governments control the use and allocation of spectrum, with varying dynamics for private versus state-owned telecoms:
- Privately Owned Telecoms: In countries with private telecom companies, governments set the rules and regulations for telecom operators. Then, they auction off spectrum rights to the highest bidder. In these markets, there is a degree of separation between the governments and the telecom providers, with telecom providers responsible for the security and maintenance of their networks.
- State-Owned Telecoms: In the case of a state-owned telecom company, the government frees up the spectrum for it to operate and maintains a full or partial stake in the company’s ongoing activities.
Once a telecom company has secured the exclusive rights to operate on a spectrum frequency, it then needs to transmit radio signals across the geographic area it wishes to cover. Telecom equipment providers such as Huawei, Nokia, and Ericsson provide telecom companies with the physical equipment they need to build out this network. Once networks are developed, third parties can send information through software code through those networks onto end-user devices such as cell phones, computers, and infrastructure sensors. Building 5G networks requires that telecom companies secure new higher-frequency spectrum to operate on, and then invest heavily in upgrading their physical network infrastructure to transmit data over this frequency.
In the case of private telecom companies, the company negotiates infrastructure contracts with telecom equipment providers such as Huawei, Nokia, and Ericsson on its own. For state-owned telecom companies, the government may negotiate these contracts for the company. The important difference is that countries with state-owned telecoms have a significant advantage in their ability to coordinate the key actors involved in building out 5G RANs. With state-owned telecoms, the government, the telecom provider, and regulators all act in coordination with a chosen telecom equipment provider with minimal pushback from any one actor. In countries where telecom providers are private, the key actors are often in competition with, or opposition to, one another.
Political and security concerns are impeding rollout across and within markets. In the U.S., despite the government ban on Huawei in May of 2019, rural telecom providers have already installed Huawei equipment across their 4G networks and are pushing to move forward with Huawei equipment largely based on price. In March of 2020, President Trump signed a law barring telecom companies from using U.S. subsidies to purchase Huawei equipment, dealing a blow to rural telecom providers in particular and laying the groundwork for an expensive and labor-intensive transition away from Huawei equipment. The situation is similar in the UK, where the British government reversed its previous stance on Huawei following a new review by the U.K.’s National Cyber Security Centre. In July 2020, the UK barred telecom companies from purchasing new Huawei equipment, and set a deadline of 2027 for UK telecoms to remove existing Huawei technology from their 5G networks. The UK ban is expected to delay the domestic development of 5G by two-to-three years and cost up to £2 billion. Meanwhile, telecom companies in private markets are pouring money into lobbying for favorable regulation on a range of technical, financial, and governance issues to gain competitive advantages, which will influence not only the operating environment but also the pace of development. In 2019, telecom companies spent $101 million on lobbying in the U.S. alone. These tensions among actors in private telecom markets are delaying 5G rollouts, while state-owned telecom markets are moving ahead relatively unencumbered.
Where Do We Stand Today?
In May of 2019, the U.S. issued a ban on Huawei equipment being used in domestic 5G markets and urged the rest of the world to follow suit. In May of 2020, on the anniversary of the U.S. banning Huawei equipment’s use in domestic 5G markets, the Trump administration extended the measure by way of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act; the ban is now in effect until May of 2021. The reality is that small carriers in the U.S. already use Huawei equipment, and U.S. companies rely on Huawei for large amounts of revenue. Still, the Trump administration is urging other governments to follow his lead and ban or restrict Huawei in their markets. However, foreign governments’ reaction to the U.S. ban has been mixed—only Japan, Australia, New Zealand, and now the UK have complied, and the U.S. itself has yet to fully enforce it—but Huawei has since come under increasing scrutiny from the EU, Canada, and India. However, shifts in political relationships between China and the EU, Canada, and India over COVID-19, the detention of Canadian nationals, and border disputes along the Himalayas are threatening Huawei’s market dominance.
Banning U.S. suppliers from working with Huawei could result in an estimated $11 billion annual loss for these companies
The U.S. Cannot “Win” on 5G Infrastructure
China’s Huawei is already the global leader in installed 5G infrastructure by a ratio of 2:1 and realistically won’t be removed from the majority of those markets, as installed infrastructure would literally need to be ripped out of the ground. Though the tension and distrust between the U.S. and China has created a global controversy around Huawei, the reality is that the U.S. does not have domestic competitors that provide equipment on par.
The Game Is Mostly Among Other Players
The 5G infrastructure contest is truly among the national champions of China, Sweden, and Finland, with those of South Korea and Japan emerging as potential players as well. While the U.S. government has led the backlash against Huawei, it is not strongly positioned to enforce this stance globally, and the main commercial beneficiaries from a Huawei ban will be foreign competitors. In addition to those countries’ sovereign decision-making, commercial realities make the dynamic more complex. U.S. suppliers are an integral part of Huawei’s supply chain—banning these suppliers from working with Huawei would mean an estimated $11 billion annual loss for U.S. companies and would risk alienating U.S. allies that are relying on Huawei to build out their 5G networks.
What’s at Stake
The U.S.’s restrictive actions, including a ban on Huawei equipment and increasingly inflammatory rhetoric against Huawei on global 5G policy, have escalated tensions between the U.S. and China. However, due to the U.S.’s waning global influence and absence of a coherent competitive strategy, Huawei is continuing to drive 5G infrastructure development globally. Even in the face of increased global scrutiny of both China and Huawei—stemming from U.S. and EU security concerns and global tensions related to COVID-19, Huawei continued to be the 5G infrastructure equipment market leader in Q1 2020 by a sizeable margin. (Huawei holds 28 percent of the market, 13 percent more than its closest competitor Nokia.) The U.S.’ (and other countries’) ongoing efforts to restrict Huawei will carry implications for not only primary equipment competitors, but the myriad companies integrated in 5G infrastructure supply chains.
How We Got Here and the Current Balance of Power
The U.S. and China are facing off over 5G infrastructure, but the playing field is currently tilted in China’s favor.
Click to find out how
The Chinese company Huawei is by far the current market leader in 5G infrastructure network equipment. With 28 percent of the telecom equipment market, it controls nearly as much market share as its two closest competitors—Nokia and Ericsson—combined. Concerned about the security implications of allowing a Chinese company to build out this critical infrastructure, President Trump signed an executive order banning Huawei and ZTE—China’s other telecom equipment manufacturer—from accessing U.S. supply chains in May of 2019. As noted above, these restrictions have been extended to May of 2021. With significant, long-running concerns over Huawei and intellectual property theft, U.S. lawmakers released a 52-page report as far back as 2012 urging U.S. companies to exclude Huawei equipment from their networks. However, the U.S. does not have a direct domestic competitor to Huawei, and for nearly the last decade, many smaller wireless providers in the U.S. have installed and relied on Huawei equipment to operate their existing networks, thus embedding Huawei equipment across the U.S.
Amid heightened concern under the Trump administration, bipartisan legislation was drafted in September of 2019 that would authorize $1 billion for small wireless carriers to replace Huawei equipment. While this cost covers replacing Huawei equipment, it does not include the costs in lost revenue while services are down. Colorado telecom provider Viaero estimated that it would lose an additional $50 million in revenues, which the current cost estimates do not take into account. Small and rural wireless providers rely extensively on low-cost equipment from Huawei, and even with subsidies, the costs of ripping out Huawei equipment may be too high for some of these carriers to continue to be profitable. Additionally, the U.S. government has not convinced most rural providers that removing Huawei equipment will make their networks more secure.
Further, there are almost 300 U.S. firms that rely on Huawei for large parts of their revenue streams, and the ban blocked them from doing business with Huawei. The Trump administration has since partially capitulated to these suppliers’ requests to continue doing business with Huawei. In November of 2019, the U.S. government sent approval and denial letters to companies wishing to continue doing business with Huawei. As of February of 2020, roughly half of the processed requests for special licenses to sell equipment to Huawei have been approved by the U.S. Department of Commerce, and in June of 2020, the Department decided to allow U.S. companies to work with Huawei on setting 5G standards. However, subsequent measures have further restricted U.S. companies’ commercial interactions with Huawei. In March of 2020, President Trump restricted U.S. companies from selling to any international suppliers that sold to Huawei. The U.S. is now pivoting toward relying on European and South Korean companies as alternative equipment providers and is urging other countries to follow suit. So far, the U.S. has proposed financing a domestic Huawei competitor through government funds, subsidizing foreign competitors, or outright buying a stake in Nokia and Ericsson. As of early July of 2020, none of these proposals had yet been enacted.
Meanwhile, the international landscape continues to evolve. Australia, Japan, New Zealand and the UK have all banned Huawei equipment from their telecom networks, and European countries such as Germany and Belgium have put restrictions on Huawei, excluding it from its 5G core network development. Further, a number of countries, such as Canada, Norway, Denmark, and Singapore, have opted to sign 5G contracts with Huawei competitors instead. However, many more countries have accepted Huawei’s presence. As of March 2020, Huawei announced it had already signed 91 commercial contracts, but declined to publicly share a full list of these contracts and has not released updated contract numbers in subsequent months. Huawei currently maintains a commercial presence through either previous. Network equipment sales or phones sales in 170 countries globally, and at least 69 of these countries have signed 5G contracts with Huawei without restrictions.
Full Timeline of U.S. Huawei Ban
Cisco sues Huawei
Cisco filed a lawsuit against Huawei alleging that the latter had unlawfully copied intellectual property from the American networking infrastructure firm. It claimed that this theft related to the unlawful copying of Cisco IOS software, which included source code as well as documentation and other materials, plus infringements of Cisco patents. Read more
Obama bans Huawei from working with the U.S. government
The Obama administration ordered several major government departments, including NASA and the Departments of Justice and Commerce, to seek approval from federal law enforcement officials before purchasing IT equipment from all Chinese vendors. Read more
December 1, 2018
Canada arrested Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou in Vancouver at the request of the United States
The U.S. brought sweeping charges against her and Huawei, portraying the company as a threat to U.S. national security. Read more
May 15, 2019
Huawei banned by executive decree
The Trump administration added Huawei to the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Entity List via executive order, thereby blacklisting the company as far as U.S. corporations are concerned. Read more
May 20, 2019
U.S. signed 90-day reprieve
The Trump administration’s Department of Commerce issued a temporary license that will allow Huawei to maintain its current products (for existing customers). Read more
May 23, 2019
Trump open to dealing with “very dangerous” Huawei
President Trump has called Huawei “very dangerous,” but said the U.S. is open to including the company as part of a future trade agreement between the U.S. and China. Read more
May 27, 2019
Huawei claimed it wouldn’t support bans of American companies
Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei told Bloomberg that he would protest a Chinese ban against Apple, calling the Cupertino company his “teacher.” Read more
May 28, 2019
Huawei sued, saying the ban is unconstitutional
Huawei filed a legal motion claiming the ban on the company working with other U.S.-based companies violates the U.S. Constitution. In its argument, Huawei said that the ban violates a constitutional law stating that Congress cannot make laws against specific individuals. Read more
May 31, 2019
China threatened to create its own “Entity List” to include American firms
According to a spokesman for China’s commerce industry, China will create an Entity List of its own. Even though the spokesman didn’t call out the U.S. or U.S.-based companies, the implication is that China’s Entity List will include U.S.-based companies. Read more
June 6, 2019
Huawei CFO announced intention to fight the U.S. to stay in Canada
Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou is currently under house arrest in Canada. In early 2020, she will go on trial and face extradition to the U.S. where she would be charged with fraud. However, she will fight to stay in Canada and avoid extradition. Read more
June 21st, 2019
Huawei filed lawsuit against U.S. Department of Commerce
In an expected move, Huawei officially filed a suit against the United States related to the Huawei ban. The company is suing the agency over telecommunications equipment seized by American officials. Read more
June 29, 2019
U.S. companies allowed to work with Huawei again
President Trump announced in a news conference. On the sidelines of the G20 summit in Osaka, Trump said “U.S. companies can sell their equipment to Huawei,” without going into detail. Read more
July 3, 2019
Commerce Department still blacklisting Huawei
Although President Trump said that at least some aspects of the Huawei ban would be lifted, an internal memo in the U.S. Department of Commerce suggests that the company is still getting the blacklist treatment. Read more
July 22, 2019
Huawei involvement with North Korea is exposed
A new report from the Washington Post suggests that Huawei worked closely with North Korea to build out that country’s internal wireless network. If true, this would be in direct violation of multiple international laws and treaties. Read more
August 19, 2019
Huawei’s 90-day reprieve extended by another 90 days
The U.S. gave Huawei a 90-day reprieve following the trade ban against the manufacturer in May. The trade ban, which allows U.S. companies to maintain business ties with Huawei, expired August 19. Read more
August 30, 2019
US reportedly received 130 license requests to sell to Huawei, none granted
The White House made an abrupt turnaround of sorts in June when President Donald Trump announced that some U.S. companies would be allowed to deal with Huawei. The Commerce Department stated at the time that licenses would be granted to U.S. companies wanting to deal with Huawei, as long as there were no security risks involved. Since then, Reuters reported that the department has received 130 license applications to sell goods and services to Huawei, none of which has been granted. Read more
September 18, 2019
Huawei still leads 5G deployment
According to Huawei, shipments for its 5G-enabled base stations appear to be generally unaffected by the trade ban. Huawei reported a 33 percent boost in sales between July and September, bringing the company’s total global shipments to 200,000 units. Read more
September 27, 2019
Huawei shipped 5G base stations without U.S. components
Despite the trade ban, Huawei still maintains its status as king of the 5G hill. On top of that, the company announced that it is producing its 5G-enabled base stations without U.S. parts, and it will double its current production rate in 2020. Read more
November 19, 2019
Huawei granted another 90-day reprieve from the U.S. government
The U.S. government has extended the temporary general license that allows U.S. firms to do business with Huawei by another 90 days. This means devices released or licensed before Huawei was placed on the U.S. Entity List will be able to receive essential software and security updates until at least March 2020. Read more
November 20, 2019
US government has made decisions on Huawei licenses
The United States government finally began sending out approval and denial letters to some of the 290 U.S.-based firms that requested special permission to work with Huawei, according to Reuters. We do not know which companies are approved or denied yet, but the very fact that licenses are going out at all is significant news, as companies have been waiting months for this to happen. Read more
December 5, 2019
Huawei sues the FCC
Huawei announced that it is suing the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC), filing in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Huawei is challenging a recently passed FCC order barring rural American carriers from using federal subsidies to purchase equipment from Huawei and ZTE. FCC Chairman Ajit Pai defends the agency’s decision, stating that the two companies pose a security threat to the U.S.’s communications networks and communications supply chain. Read more
June 15, 2020
The Department of Commerce decided to allow U.S. companies to work with Huawei on developing 5G standards. Read more
May 14, 2020
President Trump extended his May 2019 executive order banning Huawei for another year, while the Department of Commerce simultaneously extended the temporary licenses it had granted, exempting some American companies from the ban. Read more
March 12, 2020
President Trump signed legislation preventing U.S. rural telecom carriers from using Huawei network equipment. Read more
Feb. 27, 2020
The FCC started collecting data on Huawei use in U.S. networks, and the Senate passed a bill banning government purchases of Huawei gear. Read more
Current Power Positions Among the Key Players
Five main companies are competing to build 5G infrastructure globally: Huawei, ZTE, Ericsson, Nokia, and Samsung. Huawei has emerged as the market leader in this space, but while it is embroiled in controversy, and with the majority of the world’s 5G infrastructure still needing to be built, the field is incredibly competitive.
Huawei the Clear Market Leader
Ericsson and Nokia have been market leaders in the telecom equipment space for decades, but since 2010, Huawei has rapidly increased its market share and revenue through extensive research and development (R&D) funding, government grants and subsidies, and exclusive access to the massive domestic Chinese telecom market. In 2018, Huawei emerged as the market leader in the telecom equipment space. However, the recent U.S.-led effort against Huawei has opened opportunities for Nokia and Ericsson to regain some market share. Despite Ericsson and Nokia gaining ground on Huawei by way of 5G contracts, the nature of Huawei’s contracts is more impactful in terms of market power. Huawei provides end-to-end 5G solutions and signs many of its contracts with national governments in countries that have state-owned telecoms. Thus, Huawei’s contracts generally cover a larger scope of services and equipment including entire countries. Despite recent tensions, Huawei has steadily maintained its position as the market leader through Q1 2020.
Huawei’s Position Cannot Easily Be Diminished
Huawei’s 2019 revenue was 4x greater than Nokia or Ericsson, and it owns more patents on essential telecom technology than any of its competitors. Further, Huawei played an essential role in the development of 4G networks globally and has its equipment and services already deployed in 170 countries. While Huawei’s close ties to the Chinese Communist Party have raised concerns over security and competitive practices in the U.S., Huawei’s position is firmly entrenched in the 5G space globally.
What’s at Stake
Huawei’s rise positions China to capture the majority of the revenue from 5G infrastructure spending globally, expected to rise to $26 billion in 2022. Its 5G infrastructure contracts, many of which are with governments in the developing world, are enabling China to strengthen political and commercial ties in those regions, and its influence over future economic development in those countries.
Huawei's Global Expansion
Huawei is steadily securing its presence in markets around the world.
Countries with ongoing disputes surrounding Huawei
(current as of July 2020)
The ban on Huawei is still not being fully enforced, and President Trump has lifted the trade ban. In addition, the Department of Commerce is now allowing U.S. companies to work with Huawei on developing 5G standards but has taken further actions to cut off Huawei from the U.S.-based links in the global semiconductor supply chain.
The UK initially put limits on how much Huawei equipment could be used (35 percent) in their 5G networks and restricted the use of Huawei network equipment from being included in its core network. The UK’s position on an outright Huawei ban has continually fluctuated, and after the government renewed deliberations over a ban in early 2020, the UK decided to completely eliminate Huawei from their 5G networks in July 2020. UK telecoms are now restricted from purchasing new Huawei equipment and have until 2027 to remove existing equipment. The ban comes in the face of Huawei’s announcement in June 2020 that it plans to build a $1.2 billion-dollar R&D center in Cambridge.
Canada’s relationship with Huawei is fraught with ongoing tensions over Canada’s arrest of Huawei’s CFO Meng Wanzhou and the two Canadian nationals China arrested, Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig, in what Canada claims to be an act of retaliation. Canada refuses to release Meng, and Its two largest wireless companies have now signed contracts with Nokia and Ericsson instead of Huawei, effectively barring Huawei from its 5G network despite the lack of an outright ban.
Germany is remaining relatively neutral and has refused to single Huawei out. However, after conducting a security review, the German government barred “untrustworthy” sources from developing the country’s 5G network. While some interpreted this to be directed toward Huawei, there is no explicit evidence that this is the case. Despite the ambiguity on the Huawei ban, Germany’s main telecom networks have opted to use Ericsson over Huawei for their core 5G networks and are removing Huawei network equipment from their 5G core networks.
After recent border clashes with China, India is now considering excluding Huawei and ZTE from its 5G telecom networks. However, some major Indian telecoms have already begun moving forward with Huawei 5G equipment, meaning that a ban is still not likely. However, after India banned 59 Chinese apps within the country, including Tik Tok, there is now some momentum for a full or partial Huawei ban if the border situation continues to escalate and relations between China and India deteriorate further.
Huawei has had a continuous presence in Brazil, and its status for developing 5G networks within the country is still fairly certain. However, the U.S. has been putting continual pressure on Brazil to eliminate Huawei from its 5G networks. U.S. ambassador Todd Chapman has been in talks with Brazil and its local telecommunications companies about funding the acquisition of 5G gear produced by Ericsson and Nokia through the International Development Finance Corporation, a development bank created by U.S. President Donald Trump in late 2018 to counter China’s Development Bank foreign operations.
The Belgian government will impose new restrictions on using “high-risk” 5G equipment makers in the country’s core networks and will limit access to RAN networks to 35 percent for those vendors. These measures will substantially limit the use of Chinese suppliers, following the approach the UK had previously taken toward Huawei. While the restrictions are largely interpreted to be aimed at Huawei and ZTE, like in Germany, the Belgian government declined to mention any specific vendor names in their report or ruling.
Denmark will exclude 5G technology suppliers from providing critical infrastructure within its borders if they are not from countries considered security allies. Last year, Denmark’s biggest single telecoms operator TDC picked Ericsson over Huawei for its 5G network. TDC stated that it was a commercial decision but that it “was not blind” to widespread concerns about Huawei and information security.
Profiles and Power Positions
Huawei is dominating market share in the telecom equipment space.
Click to see how Huawei’s competition stacks up
Founded in 1987 by Ren Zhengfei, a former military technologist for the People’s Liberation Army. Huawei’s breakthrough came when the Chinese government awarded it contracts in data center building and telecommunications construction contracts for 4G networks in China. Despite modest origins, Huawei has grown to be the largest telecom equipment company in China and among the largest globally.
Huawei is the market leader in RAN equipment and has the second largest market share in core network infrastructure products after Ericsson. In Q1 2020, Huawei was the telecom equipment market leader, controlling 28 percent of the market. Its rise in market share has corresponded with a 364 percent increase in revenue since 2010. Huawei’s rapid rise since 2010, moving from third place in market share, behind Nokia and Ericsson, to first place, has been driven by R&D spending, subsidies, and grants from the Chinese government. In 2018, Huawei invested over $15 billion in R&D, the fourth most of any tech company in the world. Between 2010 and 2019, Huawei increased its R&D budget by 695 percent, while Ericsson’s spending increased by 23 percent, and Nokia’s declined by 25 percent.
Founded in 1985 by Hou Weigui. ZTE is China’s second-largest telecommunications equipment manufacturer competing in the 5G space. ZTE is particularly competitive in the mobile device market and formerly held a 12 percent share of the mobile phone market in the U.S. However, the U.S. implemented an import ban on ZTE in March of 2017 due to ZTE pleading guilty of illegally exporting U.S. technology to Iran and North Korea in violation of trade sanctions. After ZTE failed to adequately reprimand employees involved in the scandal, the U.S. Department of Commerce banned U.S. companies from providing exports to ZTE for seven years in April of 2018.
Presence of Competitors Worldwide Based on Publicly Announced 5G Contracts
Founded in 1876. Ericsson was the leader in the wireless equipment market space from the early 2000s, before being surpassed by Huawei in 2016. Both Ericsson and Nokia stand to gain from the U.S. government ban on Huawei and ZTE equipment and would significantly benefit if the EU were to follow suit. An EU ban of Huawei equipment would greatly boost Nokia’s and Ericsson’s competitive positions, as Europe, the Middle East, and Africa are Huawei’s biggest overseas markets, accounting for $29.8 billion in revenue (28.4 percent of total revenue) in 2018. However, Huawei has 28 commercial 5G equipment contracts already signed with European telecom providers, making it unlikely that Huawei’s future presence will be limited in Europe.
Founded in 1865, Nokia is one of the oldest telecom companies in the world. Nokia, along with Ericsson, dominated market share in the era of 3G and 4G. Nokia in particular found success in the mobile phone market, controlling a 51 percent share at its peak in 2007. Critically, Nokia and Ericsson both rely on China for sensitive equipment within their supply chains. In light of the U.S. ban on Huawei, Nokia and Ericsson are now working on moving their supply chains away from reliance on China.
Samsung (South Korea)
Founded in 1938, Samsung is South Korea’s largest chaebol (i.e., Korean conglomerate controlled by one Korean owner or family). Samsung is the only company besides Huawei that provides total end-to-end 5G solutions, including chip sets, base stations, and smartphones. Telecom equipment has traditionally been a small part of Samsung’s business, which has been primarily based around memory chips and mobile phones. With the U.S. ban on Huawei, and other countries potentially following suit, a window of opportunity has opened for Samsung to increase its market share in the 5G equipment space.
Key Stats on 5G Competitors
|Company||Current Market Position||5G Contracts||Global Presence||Standard Essential Patents|
|Huawei||In Q1 2020, Huawei was the telecom equipment market leader, controlling 28 percent of the market.||91+ Contracts; 600,000+ 5G base stations shipped.||170 countries across Asia, Europe, Latin America, and Africa.||1,554|
|ZTE||In Q1 2020, ZTE was in fourth place in the overall telecom equipment market share with 11 percent.||35 commercial 5G contracts.||ZTE has sales in 140 countries.||1,208|
|Ericsson||In Q1 2020, Ericsson was third in telecom equipment market share with 14 percent of the overall market.||95 commercial deals, 55 publicly announced contracts; 42 live 5G networks.||Ericsson does business in 180 countries globally.||819|
|Nokia||In Q1 2020, Nokia was second in telecom equipment market share with 15 percent of the overall market.||125 commercial deals, 74 publicly announced contracts; 26 live 5G networks.||Nokia does business in over 130 countries globally.||1,427|
|Samsung||In 2018, Samsung held 6.6 percent of the global telecom equipment market share.||9 publicly announced contracts, 100,000 base stations shipped.||Samsung has sales networks in 80 countries globally.||1,316|
Revenue (USD Millions)
Since 2010, Huawei has seen a 274 percent ($76.8 billion) rise in annual revenue, while Ericsson and Nokia's annual revenues have both decreased.
Research & Development Spending (USD Millions)
Since 2010, Huawei's R&D spending increased 488 percent ($12.25 billion), while Ericsson and Nokia's R&D spending both decreased
Risks and Opportunities for Insiders and Stakeholders Anticipating 5G
Completing 5G infrastructure and rolling out fully operational 5G telecom networks is a process that will take years to complete. Along the way, there are still significant potential roadblocks and developments that stakeholders in 5G should continue to monitor carefully to understand the implications for their business.
Foundational 5G Infrastructure Will Take Years to Complete
Despite the hype, construction and rollout will happen at considerably different paces across different markets. Initially, 5G speeds will vary greatly, even within countries, depending on the stage of the rollout. The majority of the infrastructure for 5G still needs to be built, with prospective delays based on market structures, regulations, and the ongoing trade and political tensions between China and the U.S. affecting equipment access.
Timing Investment Is Key
Capitalizing on 5G will require stakeholders to craft coherent and flexible 5G strategies, which takes into account both the upside of investing in 5G technology as well as an accurate timetable for when it will be available to consumers and businesses. 5G strategies should be tailored toward the key markets a business operates in, understanding that each market will present unique opportunities and challenges, and requiring ongoing monitoring of developments in target markets.
What’s at Stake
5G will be a disruptive, transformative technology, but it will initially be costly, and the benefits for businesses will be uneven and will take time to materialize. There will be opportunities to gain competitive advantage, but the development path is not linear, and keen attention will need to be paid to ongoing developments in companies’ target markets to more fully understand when and where to engage.
Next in Our 5G Power Map Series: The Global Competitive Landscape
Huawei’s presence in 5G infrastructure has become ubiquitous and entrenched. This rise has been facilitated through generous funding from the Chinese government and exclusive access to the domestic Chinese market. In the next installment of FP’s 5G Power Map, we will examine the potential effects of Huawei’s rise on global competitiveness and will dive deeper into the implications of the ongoing trade tensions between the U.S. and China. As both the U.S. and China threaten export controls and more tariffs, we will illustrate the potential ramifications along the entire 5G supply chain and what this could mean for the development of 5G networks globally. Crucially, we will examine how the competitive landscape in 5G exemplifies the diverging business models of Western and Chinese companies, and we will lay out what businesses outside of the telecom industry need to know to navigate this evolving environment.
Written by Christian Perez. Edited by Allison Carlson. Copyedited by David Johnstone. Design and development by Andrew Baughman. Art direction by Adam Griffiths. Graphics by Colin Hayes for Foreign Policy. Photos by Getty Images.
Learn more about how FP Analytics can enable your organization to act strategically through data-driven insights at ForeignPolicy.com/FP-Analytics.
For More FP Insights on 5G:
- 5G Cell Towers - Are They Safe & Who Decides Where They Go? (2020, January 13). Retrieved January 15, 202AD, from https://www.celltowerleaseexperts.com/cell-tower-lease-news/5g-cell-towers-are-they-safe-who-decides-where-they-go/
- 5G spectrum auction by year-end or early 2020: Ravi Shankar Prasad. (2019, September 13). Retrieved December 12, 2019, from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/telecom/telecom-news/5g-spectrum-auction-by-year-end-or-early-2020-ravi-shankar-prasad/articleshow/71117477.cms?from=mdr
- Abi-habib, M. (2020, June 29). India Bans Nearly 60 Chinese Apps, Including TikTok and WeChat. Retrieved July 6, 2020, from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/29/world/asia/tik-tok-banned-india-china.html
- Alper, A. (2019, November 21). Some Huawei suppliers get U.S. approval to restart sales to blacklisted firm. Retrieved January 7, 2020, from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-china-huawei-tech/u-s-begins-issuing-some-licenses-for-companies-to-supply-goods-to-huawei-idUSKBN1XU21Q?feedType=RSS&feedName=technologyNews
- Blatchford, A. (2020, June 3). Canadian telecom giants move to European 5G suppliers as government mulls Huawei ban. Retrieved July 6, 2020, from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/03/canadian-telecom-giants-move-to-european-5g-suppliers-as-government-mulls-huawei-ban-298994
- Brown, S. (2020, March 13). Trump signs law barring rural carriers from using Huawei gear. Retrieved July 7, 2020, from https://www.cnet.com/news/trump-signs-law-barring-rural-carriers-from-using-huawei-gear/
- Burkitt-Gray, A. (2020, June 16). ‘Don’t buy Huawei kit or we’ll rethink,’ US tells Brazil. Retrieved July 2, 2020, from https://www.capacitymedia.com/articles/3825708/-dont-buy-huawei-or-well-rethink-investment-us-tells-brazil
- Busvine, D. (2019, February 28). 5G infrastructure to cost $2.7 trillion. Then what? Retrieved January 3, 2020, from https://disruptive.asia/5g-infrastructure-cost-2-7-trillion/
- Campbell, K., & Flanagan, B. (n.d.). The 5G Economy (pp. 4–45). London, UK: IHS Markit.
- Cerulus, L. (2020, June 25). Belgium to cut down on Huawei gear. Retrieved July 2, 2020, from https://www.politico.eu/article/belgium-huawei-restrictions/
- Chazan, G. (2020, February 11). Germany’s CDU stops short of Huawei ban in 5G rollout. Retrieved July 6, 2020, from https://www.ft.com/content/e17ba42a-4ce1-11ea-95a0-43d18ec715f5
- Chuang, T. (2019, November 4). Removing banned tech from China's Huawei will cost rural Colorado telecoms over $300 million. Will it even fix the problem? Retrieved January 7, 2020, from https://coloradosun.com/2019/11/04/removing-banned-tech-from-chinas-huawei-will-cost-rural-colorado-telecoms-over-300-million-will-it-even-fix-the-problem/
- Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. (n.d.). Overview of Risks Introduced by 5G Adoption in the United States (pp. 4–5). Washington, DC.
- Davies, J. (2018, April 16). Ericsson is losing the R&D game and that needs to change. Retrieved December 10, 2019, from https://telecoms.com/482479/ericsson-is-losing-the-rd-game-and-that-needs-to-change/
- Davis, B., & Ferek, K.S. (2020, May 15). U.S. Moves to Cut Off Chip Supplies to Huawei. Retrieved July 7, 2020, from https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-moves-to-cut-off-chip-supplies-to-huawei-11589545335
- Dayaram, S. (2020, June 17). US companies allowed to work with Huawei on setting 5G standards. Retrieved July 7, 2020, from https://www.cnet.com/news/us-firms-now-allowed-to-work-with-huawei-on-5g-standards/
- Dellinger, A. J. (2019, June 1). Here's How Telecom Giants Spent More Than $1 Billion Lobbying Congress. Retrieved January 5, 2019, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/ajdellinger/2019/05/31/heres-how-telecom-giants-spent-more-than-1-billion-lobbying-congress/#4840116175c8
- Duckett, C. (2020, June 3). Canadian major telcos effectively lock Huawei out of 5G build. Retrieved July 6, 2020, from https://www.zdnet.com/article/canadian-major-telcos-effectively-lock-huawei-out-of-5g-build/
- Duffy, S. (2019). 5G: A Transformative Technology (pp. 5–12). London, UK: Barclays.
- Feiner, L. (2020, January 15). Senators propose pumping over $1 billion into 5G alternatives to China’s Huawei. Retrieved July 7, 2020, from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/14/senators-propose-over-1-billion-for-5g-alternatives-to-chinas-huawei.html
- Feng, E., & Cheng, A. (2019, October 24). China's Tech Giant Huawei Spans Much Of The Globe Despite U.S. Efforts To Ban It. Retrieved December 12, 2019, from https://www.npr.org/2019/10/24/759902041/chinas-tech-giant-huawei-spans-much-of-the-globe-despite-u-s-efforts-to-ban-it
- Fidler, S., & Colchester, M. (2020, July 14). U.K. to Ban Huawei From Its 5G Networks Amid China-U.S. Tensions. Retrieved July 14, 2020, from https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-k-makes-u-turn-on-huawei-after-u-s-pressure-11594727179
- Fung, B. (2019, December 23). How China's Huawei took the lead over U.S. companies in 5G technology. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/04/10/us-spat-with-huawei-explained/
- Germany’s Telefonica Deutschland picks Ericsson for 5G core network. (2020, June 2). Retrieved July 6, 2020, from https://www.scmp.com/tech/policy/article/3087184/germanys-telefonica-deutschland-picks-ericsson-5g-core-network-over
- Ging. P (2020, May 8). COVID-19 has exposed fundamental tensions between EU and China. Retrieved July 7, 2020, from https://www.euronews.com/2020/05/08/coronavirus-covid-19-has-exposed-fundamental-tensions-between-eu-and-china
- Goasduff, Laurence. “Gartner Forecasts Worldwide 5G Network Infrastructure Revenue to Reach $4.2 Billion in 2020.” Gartner, Gartner, 22 Aug. 2019, https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2019-08-22-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-5g-network-infrastructure
- Goh, B. (2019, December 30). Huawei's 2019 revenue to jump 18%, forecasts 'difficult' 2020. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-huawei-tech-results/huaweis-2019-revenue-to-jump-18-forecasts-difficult-2020-idUSKBN1YY1JL
- Gold, H. (2020, June 25). Huawei to build $1.2 billion Cambridge facility as it faces uncertain UK future. Retrieved July 6, 2020, from https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/25/tech/huawei-cambridge-uk/index.html
- Goldstein, P. (2009, March 11). Report: Nokia's smartphone market share dropping. Retrieved December 19, 2019, from https://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/report-nokia-s-smartphone-market-share-dropping
- Greene, J. (2012, October 8). Lawmakers to U.S. companies: Don't buy Huawei, ZTE. Retrieved January 7, 2020, from https://www.cnet.com/news/lawmakers-to-u-s-companies-dont-buy-huawei-zte/
- Haselton, T. (2018, May 25). Why the US is in a fight with Chinese phone maker ZTE, and why Trump wants to end it. Retrieved December 9, 2019, from https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/22/why-the-us-is-in-a-fight-with-chinese-phone-maker-zte.html
- Hays, D., & Isaac, C. (n.d.). Why 5G can't succeed without a small cell revolution (pp. 2–7). London, UK: PwC.
- Heikkilä, M. (2020, May 23). UK to cut Huawei’s involvement in 5G network: Reports. Retrieved July 6, 2020, from https://www.politico.eu/article/reports-uk-to-cut-huaweis-involvement-in-5g-network/
- Hernández, J.C., & Porter, C. (2020, June 19). China Indicts 2 Canadians on Spying Charges, Escalating Dispute. Retrieved July 7, 2020, from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/19/world/asia/china-canada-kovrig-spavor.html
- Hoffman, C. (2020, January 4). What Is 5G, and How Fast Will It Be? Retrieved January 10, 2020, from https://www.howtogeek.com/340002/what-is-5g-and-how-fast-will-it-be/
- Huawei confirms it has signed 5G-MoUs with 45 operators. (2018, March 5). Retrieved December 13, 2019, from https://www.telecomreviewasia.com/index.php/news/industry-news/956-huawei-confirms-it-has-signed-5g-mous-with-45-operators
- Huawei's R&D investment in 2018 exceeds $15 billion. (2019, September 4). Retrieved January 10, 2020, from https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201904/09/WS5cac0859a3104842260b5265.html
- Intelligence Brief: How much will 5G cost? (2019, April 17). Retrieved January 7, 2020, from https://www.mobileworldlive.com/blog/intelligence-brief-how-much-will-5g-cost/
- Keane, S. (2020, June 25). Huawei ban timeline: Uber rival hits AppGallery store as it moves towards self-sufficiency. Retrieved July 6, 2020, from https://www.cnet.com/news/huawei-ban-full-timeline-us-restrictions-china-military-trump-executive-order-fcc-security-threat/
- Keane, S. (2020, May 15). Trump executive order targeting Huawei gets extended for another year. Retrieved July 6, 2020, from https://www.cnet.com/news/trump-extends-executive-order-targeting-huawei-for-another-year-temporary-license/
- Kharpal, A. (2019, September 3). Huawei touts more than 50 contracts for 5G as US pressure continues to mount. Retrieved January 5, 2020, from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/03/huawei-touts-more-than-50-contracts-for-5g-as-us-pressure-mounts.html
- Kharpal, A. (2020, June 30). After Pompeo says ‘tide is turning against Huawei,’ India reportedly weighs 5G ban on Chinese firm. Retrieved July 6, 2020, from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/30/india-reportedly-weighs-5g-ban-on-huawei-amid-tensions-with-china.html#:~:text=Huawei could be banned from,country's trials for the technology.&text=In December, India said it,in 5G trials with vendors.
- Lecher, C. (2019, June 5). Ripping Huawei out of US networks could be a nightmare for rural providers. Retrieved December 10, 2019, from https://www.theverge.com/2019/6/5/18652769/huawei-china-security-rural-internet-rip-replace
- Leonard, M. (2019, June 11). Report: Nokia and Ericsson look to shift supply chains away from China. Retrieved December 10, 2019, from https://www.supplychaindive.com/news/nokia-ericsson-shift-supply-chain-china/556617/
- Liao, R. (2019, June 25). Huawei says two-thirds of 5G networks outside China now use its gear. Retrieved December 18, 2019, from https://techcrunch.com/2019/06/25/huawei-wins-5g-contracts/
- Magee, T. (2019, September 10). Huawei controversies timeline: Everything you need to know. Retrieved December 5, 2019, from https://www.computerworld.com/article/3427998/huawei-controversies-timeline.html
- Markgraf, B. (2016, October 26). How Far Can a Cell Tower Be for a Cellphone to Pick Up the Signal? Retrieved December 18, 2019, from https://smallbusiness.chron.com/far-can-cell-tower-cellphone-pick-up-signal-32124.html
- Melo, G. (2020, June 12). U.S., Brazil in talks on funding to buy 5G gear from Ericsson, Nokia: Paper. Retrieved July 7, 2020, from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-brazil-usa-telecoms/u-s-brazil-in-talks-on-funding-to-buy-5g-gear-from-ericsson-nokia-paper-idUSKBN23J2P1
- Miller, R. (2020, January 6). The 5G Rollout: The Hype is Building Faster Than the Infrastructure. Retrieved December 17, 2019, from https://datacenterfrontier.com/the-5g-rollout-the-hype-is-building-faster-than-the-infrastructure/
- Musil, S. (2020, February 28). Senate passes bill banning government purchases of Huawei gear. Retrieved July 7, 2020, from https://www.cnet.com/news/senate-passes-bill-banning-government-purchases-of-huawei-gear/
- Nokia Vs. Ericsson: A Detailed Comparison. (2019, October 8). Retrieved December 12, 2019, from https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/nokia-vs.-ericsson:-a-detailed-comparison-2019-10-08
- Pongratz, S. (2020, March 2). The Telecom Equipment Market 2019. Retrieved July 7, 2020, from https://www.delloro.com/the-telecom-equipment-market-2019/
- Ravenscraft, E. (2020, March 23). Why It’s So Hard for the U.S. to Ban Huawei. Retrieved July 6, 2020, from https://onezero.medium.com/why-its-so-hard-for-the-u-s-to-ban-huawei-3d1f17391dc0#:~:text=Almost a year after it,Huawei has not been enforced&text=May of 2019, the United,represented a national security risk
- Recon Analytics. (2019). How America’S 4G Leadership Propelled The U.S. Economy (pp. 3–16). Dedham, MA.
- Robuck, M. (2019, August 29). Despite political turmoil, Huawei leads telecom equipment market-report. Retrieved December 17, 2019, from https://www.fiercetelecom.com/telecom/despite-political-turmoil-huawei-leads-telecom-equipment-market-report
- Rowand, M. (2020, June 18). The Bloody China-India Border Fight Is a Lot Like the Last One. Retrieved July 7, 2020, from https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/06/18/china-india-1967-nathu-la-war/
- Sabbagh, D. (2020, May 22). Boris Johnson forced to reduce Huawei's role in UK’s 5G networks. Retrieved July 6, 2020, from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/may/22/boris-johnson-forced-to-reduce-huaweis-role-in-uks-5g-networks
- Saqib Shah, X.Z. (2020, March 12). Samsung must spend big on 5G kit, M&A to gain market share, say analysts. Retrieved July 6, 2020, from https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/samsung-must-spend-big-on-5g-kit-m-a-to-gain-market-share-say-analysts-57509007#:~:text=At the end of 2019,obstacles including U.S. trade restrictions.
- Secretary Ross Announces Activation of ZTE Denial Order in Response to Repeated False Statements to the U.S. Government. (2018, April 16). Retrieved December 11, 2019, from https://www.commerce.gov/news/press-releases/2018/04/secretary-ross-announces-activation-zte-denial-order-response-repeated
- Shepardson, D. (2019, September 24). U.S. lawmakers propose $1 billion fund to replace Huawei equipment. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-huawei-congress/u-s-lawmakers-propose-1-billion-fund-to-replace-huawei-equipment-idUSKBN1W931C
- Shin-hyung, L. (2019, November 20). Samsung takes on Huawei in race for 5G dominance: Article. Retrieved January 6, 2020, from https://www.asiatimes.com/2019/11/article/samsung-takes-on-huawei-in-race-for-5g-dominance/
- Skydsgaard, N., & Jacobsen, S. (2020, June 8). Denmark wants 5G suppliers from closely allied countries, says defence minister. Retrieved July 7, 2020, from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-telecoms-5g-denmark/denmark-wants-5g-suppliers-from-closely-allied-countries-says-defence-minister-idUSKBN23F1IT
- Smith, T. (2020, January 5). 3 Stocks to Benefit From the 5G Spending Boom. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from https://www.investopedia.com/3-stocks-to-benefit-from-the-5g-spending-boom-4584440
- Tan, J. (2019, October 7). Banning Huawei Means Its U.S. Suppliers Will Lose $11 Billion Annually. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from https://www.fiercewireless.com/sponsored/banning-huawei-means-its-u-s-suppliers-will-lose-11-billion-annually
- Tao, L. (2019, July 19). Huawei gets 60 per cent of 5G contracts from Europe. Retrieved December 12, 2019, from https://www.scmp.com/tech/big-tech/article/3019248/nearly-60-huaweis-50-5g-contracts-are-europe
- Telecom Services Lobbying Profile. (n.d.). Retrieved July 7, 2020, from http://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/industries/summary?cycle=2019&id=B09
- The Huawei and US debacle: The story so far (Updated January 16). (2020, January 16). Retrieved January 17, 2020, from https://www.androidauthority.com/huawei-google-android-ban-988382/
- US regulator to bar China's Huawei and ZTE from government subsidy program. (2019, October 29). Retrieved December 10, 2019, from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/29/us-regulator-to-bar-chinas-huawei-and-zte-from-government-subsidies.html
- US Smartphone Market Share: By Quarter. (2019, November 28). Retrieved January 8, 2020, from https://www.counterpointresearch.com/us-market-smartphone-share/
- Wheeler, T. (2019, December 23). Going backwards in the 'race for 5G'. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/techtank/2019/12/20/going-backwards-in-the-race-for-5g/
Have a minute? We'd love to get your thoughts on what you're reading. Help guide future Power Maps by taking a brief survey on 5G Explained.