America Dropped the Baton in the Rare-Earth Race
Washington keeps trying to play catch-up in the rare-earth game with China. It’s losing ground.
If the global scramble for rare earths—the elements behind F-35 fighter jets and missile guidance systems—were a relay race, China grabbed the baton in the 1980s and bolted. The United States, once an industry leader, was left in the dust, along with the rest of the world.
If the global scramble for rare earths—the elements behind F-35 fighter jets and missile guidance systems—were a relay race, China grabbed the baton in the 1980s and bolted. The United States, once an industry leader, was left in the dust, along with the rest of the world.
Souring U.S.-China relations have reignited U.S. efforts to get back in the game. Eager to slash its reliance on Beijing, Washington has ramped up efforts to resurrect its own rare-earth industry. But even with this new momentum, experts say lawmakers remain stumped over how to counter China’s economies of scale and plug a gaping expertise gap, two key vulnerabilities that have long hampered the American sector. Rare-earth mining is also notoriously dirty—one reason the U.S. industry has shrunk—and prospective companies must contend with lengthy regulatory and permitting processes.
To reconstitute the U.S. rare-earth industry, “You need educated people; you need experienced people; you need mines and processing systems that are operational,” said Jack Lifton, the executive chairman of the Critical Minerals Institute. “None of this exists in the United States. None.”
Rare earths, a group of 17 elements, are anything but rare, but they do underpin everything from high-tech weapons to wind turbines. Yet China overwhelmingly dominates the supply chains that transform ore into powerful permanent magnets, commanding 85 percent of processing and 92 percent of magnet production. Beijing briefly wielded its rare earths as political leverage in the past—and has reportedly weighed an export ban on certain types of magnet technology recently—further underscoring how its industry could be a major pressure point for both Washington and U.S. defense companies alike.
“More than 95 percent of rare-earth materials or metals come from, or are processed in, China. There is no alternative,” defense giant Raytheon chief Greg Hayes warned this week. “If we had to pull out of China, it would take us many, many years to reestablish that capability either domestically or in other friendly countries.”
From submarine sonar to aircraft disk drive motors, the U.S. military is almost wholly reliant on China’s extensive rare-earth value chains. Every Lockheed Martin F-35 fighter jet, for example, is built with 920 pounds of rare earths; an Aegis destroyer requires around 5,200 pounds. The Mongols’ great weakness was the lack of siege engines; America’s problem is that they are made by its rival.
Alarmed by this dependence, former U.S. President Donald Trump issued an executive order on rare earths and boosted funding for domestic firms. The Biden administration built on these actions, including by incorporating rare-earth projects into its Defense Production Act and expanding its rare-earth stockpile. But U.S. efforts have, by and large, failed to move the needle, said James Kennedy, the president of ThREE Consulting, a rare-earth consultancy.
“For 15 years now, the United States has been pursuing or promoting or pushing policies, and every one of them has been an abysmal failure,” he said.
Christopher Ecclestone, a mining strategist at the financial advisory firm Hallgarten & Company, likened Washington’s approach to a hamster running circles on a wheel. U.S. policy has been “going round and round like some sort of hypnotic sort of wheel,” he said. “It mesmerizes people, but it’s not actually producing anything at the other end.”
Part of the trouble is that lawmakers are facing a policy challenge of a near-Herculean scale: building out an entire industry from scratch, when China already has a decadeslong lead. Mountain Pass in California, the United States’ sole rare-earth mine, has very limited amounts of the heavy rare earths required for military purposes and currently ships nearly all of its output to China. But it’s now attempting to carve out a bigger stake in the global industry, with plans to build out separating and processing capabilities backed by a $35 million Biden administration package.
In recent months, Reps. Guy Reschenthaler and Eric Swalwell have also introduced bipartisan legislation that would use tax credits to stimulate domestic magnet production, the latest in a slew of government efforts to incentivize production at the top of the rare-earth value chain. (They also attempted to advance a similar bill in 2021.) Some experts warn it may not have the desired effect: Kennedy noted that the bill’s language doesn’t differentiate between types of magnets, so firms could still qualify for the tax credit if they produce cheap, low-grade magnets. The goodies are the smaller, precision-milled permanent magnets that do wonders in the defense sector.
Stan Trout, the founder of Spontaneous Materials, said that the legislation would likely incentivize the production of physically larger magnets—like those that go into wind turbines—as opposed to magnets with defense applications. “That bill, whether they knew it or not, actually would tend to push people toward making magnets for wind turbines over anything else, because they get paid by the kilogram,” he said.
The challenges in crafting this legislation underscore how U.S. lawmakers are still struggling to crack the code on kick-starting an industry that can compete with China’s. Decades of investment and intense subsidies have given China sweeping economies of scale, making it nearly impossible for U.S. firms to enter the market.
“You can roll up to the Pentagon or Washington and say, well, give us some money and we’re going to do rare earths, and then Washington will peel off, you know, $2 million, $4 million, whatever, and say here, go play with this,” Ecclestone said. “But it’s not money that moves the dial.”
Beyond the economics, U.S. efforts have also been hampered by a vast expertise gap that has only widened over the years. While China funneled resources and money into research efforts at universities, laboratories, and other agencies, interest and investment receded in the United States. In 1996, Washington also shuttered the U.S. Bureau of Mines, a key research agency—dealing yet another blow to an already-crumbling industry.
“In China, rare-earth mining, refining, processing, fabricating, and making end-use products like rare-earth permanent magnet motors is a respected and profitable business, and there’s tens of thousands of people involved in that,” Lifton said. “Here [in the United States], there is no one.”
Whether Washington can build up its own industry—or if it will remain largely reliant on China—is a question that has ramifications that extend far beyond the defense sector.
“If EVs are the mode of transportation in the future, there’s really not much of a place for the United States or the EU,” Kennedy said. “China can continue to leverage its position and continue to force more and more components to be made in China, and then more value-added systems, and then complete automobiles.”
“China can decide who wins and loses,” he added.
Christina Lu is a reporter at Foreign Policy. Twitter: @christinafei
More from Foreign Policy

America Is a Heartbeat Away From a War It Could Lose
Global war is neither a theoretical contingency nor the fever dream of hawks and militarists.

The West’s Incoherent Critique of Israel’s Gaza Strategy
The reality of fighting Hamas in Gaza makes this war terrible one way or another.

Biden Owns the Israel-Palestine Conflict Now
In tying Washington to Israel’s war in Gaza, the U.S. president now shares responsibility for the broader conflict’s fate.

Taiwan’s Room to Maneuver Shrinks as Biden and Xi Meet
As the latest crisis in the straits wraps up, Taipei is on the back foot.
Join the Conversation
Commenting on this and other recent articles is just one benefit of a Foreign Policy subscription.
Already a subscriber?
.Subscribe Subscribe
View Comments
Join the Conversation
Join the conversation on this and other recent Foreign Policy articles when you subscribe now.
Subscribe Subscribe
Not your account?
View Comments
Join the Conversation
Please follow our comment guidelines, stay on topic, and be civil, courteous, and respectful of others’ beliefs.