Skip to main content
Foreign Policy Magazine Foreign Policy Magazine
  • Sign In
  • Give a Gift Give a Gift
  • Subscribe Subscribe Upgrade Upgrade
  • Latest
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Podcasts
  • The Magazine
  • Newsletters
  • FP Live
  • Events
  • FP Analytics
Search Icon

latest

The Fighter

John Bolton was once the enfant terrible of the Republican Party. Is he now its conscience?

Interview |
Amy Mackinnon

The Deeper Reason Netanyahu Won’t Arm Ukraine Against Russia

Jerusalem’s ties to Moscow are partly about security. They’re also about illiberalism.

Analysis |
Steven A. Cook

EU Bans Russian Diesel

Europe is reducing its dependency on Moscow, but what will it mean for prices?

Morning Brief |
Emily Tamkin

Who Shapes Environmental Policy Worldwide?

In the Amazon and elsewhere, nature’s last best hope is a hodgepodge of forces.

Flash Points |
FP Contributors
See All Stories
  • FP Events
  • FP Studios
  • FP Analytics
  • FP PeaceGames
  • Subscription Services
  • Group Subscriptions
  • Reprint Permissions
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • FP Guides – Graduate Education
  • FP For Education
  • FP Archive
  • Buy Back Issues
  • Work At FP
  • Meet the Staff
  • Advertising/Partnerships
  • Country Reports
  • Sign In
  • Give a Gift Give a Gift
  • Subscribe Subscribe Upgrade Upgrade
Search Icon

: Global risks demand more cooperation, not less Global risks demand more cooperation, not less...

SHARE: Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on WhatsApp Print this page Share via Email
Sponsored Content

Global risks demand more cooperation, not less

Ruins of the Greek Roman Theater with Etna erupting, Taormina, Sicily, Italy

By Mats Andersson, Vice Chairman of the Global Challenges Foundation

 

When leaders of the world’s seven richest economies converge on the island of Sicily for their annual summit, they will do so against a backdrop of deep disquiet.

Whether it’s the risk of North Korea developing a functioning nuclear missile, the recent deployment of chemical weapons in Syria, or the possible retreat of American support for the Paris climate change accord, we’re living in an era of uncertainty.

The risks we face in 2017 cannot be overstated. Indeed, many of them are what we would call ‘global catastrophic risks,’ that is, they have the potential to impact at least ten per cent of humanity. Many threaten a much greater proportion of our species and some could wipe out the entire human race.

Political conflict, climate change, environmental degradation, pandemics: these risks are all interconnected. They are not contained within national borders, nor do they fit into the silos of separate government agencies or academic specialties. We cannot view them or manage them in isolation. Leaders can ignore them because they fall outside the limited scope of their mandates, but silos will not offer protection from the consequences.

At the Global Challenges Foundation, we believe decision-makers are not paying sufficient attention to global catastrophic risks. Our report Global Catastrophic Risks 2017  is intended to incite deeper understanding of these threats and promote more urgent discussion of how they are collectively managed. The report includes analysis of the ten greatest risks from experts around the world. Let’s hope G7 leaders will find time to read it during their sojourn in Sicily.

For informed and enlightened global leadership is needed now as never before – and managing global risks requires global governance. Over the past 100 years we have created a series of international institutions to provide a forum for negotiation, guidelines on behavior, and tools for implementation of commitments. National governments have created new institutions for every new risk. And yet, the institutions we rely on to ensure peace, security, development and environmental integrity are woefully inadequate for the scale of the challenges at hand.

When it comes to the structures of global governance, business as usual is no longer an option.  Our understanding of risks and their causes and consequences has improved significantly. Connectivity has increased dramatically, allowing us to witness and project impacts, engage with people across the world, and create communities of change makers. Our ability to imagine, initiate and implement change has magnified and multiplied. The global community needs to collaborate across scales and sectors, whether to manage the threat of nuclear conflict, avert climate change or deal with the risks of biotechnology and Artificial Intelligence, among others.

It is often stated that the public has no interest in global affairs. This claim would appear to be contradicted by a new eight country ComRes survey commissioned by the Global Challenges Foundation. Nearly three quarters (71%) of those surveyed said they thought a new supranational organization should be created to make enforceable decisions to address global risks. In the United States, support for this kind of organization has risen to 67% from 49% in 2014 when a similar survey was conducted.

The same ComRes survey found that, when it comes to global risks, three in five adults (61%) feel the world is more insecure today compared with two years ago. Weapons of mass destruction, escalating political conflict and climate change are the risks called out as demanding the most urgent responses, by over half of adults (62%, 57% and 56% respectively).

In a bid to catalyze transformational thinking on global decision-making, the Global Challenges Foundation launched The New Shape Prize in November 2016. It’s an ambitious bid to remodel global cooperation, to reshape the very architecture of global governance. The US$5million open competition calls for fresh ideas from change makers in all spheres: policy makers, academics, think tank analysts, NGO activists, business leaders, scientists, or tech innovators. So far we have received 11,593 registrations of interest from 183 countries and 200 entries from 60 countries. With the competition open until through September 2017, we look forward to many more.

The response to the New Shape challenge has inspired and motivated us. We are witnessing a genuine commitment to imagining a new system and tapping a well of creativity. Now world leaders must play their part. Without them, real change is impossible.

People on every continent are clamoring for more effective leadership to counter the risks that threaten their and their children’s futures.

Mats Andersson is Vice Chairman and a Board member at the Global Challenges Foundation which today launches its annual report, Global Catastrophic Risks 2017, an analysis of the greatest risks to humanity and how they are currently governed. He is the former CEO of Sweden’s AP4 pension fund and co-founder of the Portfolio Decarbonization Coalition which has successfully reduced global pension fund investments in heavily polluting companies. 

 

About the Global Challenges Foundation/ComRes survey

Global Challenges Foundation commissioned ComRes to conduct an online survey between 27 April and 10 May 2017 of 8,101 adults across Australia (1,000), Brazil (1,018), China (1,031), Germany (1,001), India (1,013), South Africa (1,038), the United Kingdom (1,000) and the United States (1,000). The data were weighted to be nationally representative of the population in each of the country by age, gender and region. Full data tables are available at www.comresglobal.com.

Loading graphics
Foreign Policy Magazine
Foreign Policy Magazine
  • FP Events
  • FP Studios
  • FP Analytics
  • FP PeaceGames
  • Subscription Services
  • Group Subscriptions
  • Reprint Permissions
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • FP Guides – Graduate Education
  • FP For Education
  • FP Archive
  • Buy Back Issues
  • Work At FP
  • Meet the Staff
  • Advertising/Partnerships
  • Country Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
Powered by WordPress VIP
© 2023, Graham Digital Holding Company

Welcome to a world of insight.

Make the most of FP.

Explore the benefits of your FP subscription. Explore the benefits included in your subscription.

Stay updated on the topics you care about with email alerts. Sign up below. Stay updated on the topics you care about with email alerts. Sign up below.

Choose a few newsletters that interest you. Get more insight in your inbox.

Here are some we think you might like. Update your newsletter preferences.

  • Morning Brief thumbnail

    Your guide to the most important world stories of the day. Delivered Monday-Friday.

  • Africa Brief thumbnail

    Essential analysis of the stories shaping geopolitics on the continent. Delivered Wednesday.

  • Latin America Brief thumbnail

    One-stop digest of politics, economics, and culture. Delivered Friday.

  • China Brief thumbnail

    The latest news, analysis, and data from the country each week. Delivered Wednesday.

  • South Asia Brief thumbnail

    Weekly update on developments in India and its neighbors. Delivered Thursday.

  • Situation Report thumbnail

    Weekly update on what’s driving U.S. national security policy. Delivered Thursday.

  • A curated selection of our very best long reads. Delivered Wednesday & Sunday.

  • Evening roundup with our editors’ favorite stories of the day. Delivered Monday-Saturday.

  • A monthly digest of the top articles read by FP subscribers.

Keep up with the world without stopping yours. Keep up with the world without stopping yours.

Download the FP mobile app to read anytime, anywhere. Download the new FP mobile app to read anytime, anywhere.

Download on the App Store
  • Read the magazine
  • Save articles (and read offline)
  • Customize your feed
  • Listen to FP podcasts
Download on the Apple App Store
Download on the Google Play Store

Analyze the world’s biggest events. Analyze the world’s biggest events.

Join in-depth conversations and interact with foreign-policy experts with FP Live logo Join in-depth conversations and interact with foreign-policy experts with FP Live logo

A Russian flag at the Embassy of Russia is seen through a bus stop post in Washington, DC on April 15, 2021. - The US announced sanctions against Russia on April 15, 2021, and the expulsion of 10 diplomats in retaliation for what Washington says is the Kremlin's US election interference, a massive cyber attack and other hostile activity. President Joe Biden ordered a widening of restrictions on US banks trading in Russian government debt, expelled 10 diplomats who include alleged spies, and sanctioned 32 individuals alleged to have tried to meddle in the 2020 presidential election, the White House said. (Photo by MANDEL NGAN / AFP) (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images)
A Russian flag at the Embassy of Russia is seen through a bus stop post in Washington, DC on April 15, 2021. - The US announced sanctions against Russia on April 15, 2021, and the expulsion of 10 diplomats in retaliation for what Washington says is the Kremlin's US election interference, a massive cyber attack and other hostile activity. President Joe Biden ordered a widening of restrictions on US banks trading in Russian government debt, expelled 10 diplomats who include alleged spies, and sanctioned 32 individuals alleged to have tried to meddle in the 2020 presidential election, the White House said. (Photo by MANDEL NGAN / AFP) (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images)

Do U.S. Sanctions Work?

February 6, 2023  |  12:00pm ET
Register now Ask a Question Ask a Question
✓  

Registered

  |   Ask a Question Ask a Question   |   Add to Calendar
  1. Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

    Subscribe

    ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN

  2. Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

    Subscribe

    ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN

When Washington seeks to curtail Beijing’s ambitions or punish Moscow for its war in Ukraine, it often turns to a familiar tool: sanctions. In the last two years, the Biden administration ...Show morehas deployed unprecedented muscle in the form of sanctions as part of its foreign-policy arsenal. The question is whether those sanctions work effectively. In which countries are they achieving their desired impact? Where are they less successful? And how does the use of sanctions impact U.S. power more broadly? Join FP’s Ravi Agrawal in conversation with two experts: Agathe Demarais, the global forecasting director at the Economist Intelligence Unit and author of Backfire: How Sanctions Reshape the World Against U.S. Interests, and Nicholas Mulder, an assistant professor of history at Cornell University and author of The Economic Weapon: The Rise of Sanctions as a Tool of Modern War. Together, they will explore how sanctions impact U.S. interests today and whether policymakers need to change course.

JERUSALEM, ISRAEL - DECEMBER 29:  Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Minister of National Security Itamar Ben Gvir react after sworn in at the Israeli parliament during a new government sworn in discussion at the Israeli parliament on December 29, 2022 in Jerusalem, Israel. Conservative Benjamin Netanyahu and a bloc of nationalist and religious parties won a clear election victory last month and will be sworn in as government to the Knesset today. This completes Netenyahu's political comeback with a record sixth term in office.  (Photo by Amir Levy/Getty Images)
JERUSALEM, ISRAEL - DECEMBER 29: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Minister of National Security Itamar Ben Gvir react after sworn in at the Israeli parliament during a new government sworn in discussion at the Israeli parliament on December 29, 2022 in Jerusalem, Israel. Conservative Benjamin Netanyahu and a bloc of nationalist and religious parties won a clear election victory last month and will be sworn in as government to the Knesset today. This completes Netenyahu's political comeback with a record sixth term in office. (Photo by Amir Levy/Getty Images)

Israel’s Democratic Decline

February 13, 2023  |  11:00am ET
Register now Ask a Question Ask a Question
✓  

Registered

  |   Ask a Question Ask a Question   |   Add to Calendar
  1. Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

    Subscribe

    ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN

  2. Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

    Subscribe

    ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN

The new Israeli government is said to be the most far-right, religiously extreme, and ultranationalist coalition in the country’s history, led by Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s longest-ser...Show moreving prime minister.  Is Israel’s democracy really at risk? What would the government’s planned judicial overhaul mean for Israel’s standing, global cooperation, and economic investments? How does the new government complicate matters for U.S. President Joe Biden’s national security strategy?  Join FP’s Dan Ephron in conversation with Amir Tibon, a senior editor and writer at Israel’s Haaretz newspaper. They’ll discuss Israel’s new far-right government, its plans to overhaul and weaken the judiciary, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ongoing corruption trial, and U.S. policy on Israel under President Joe Biden. 

An illustration shows US President Joe Biden surrounded by the foreign-policy issues he has faced in his first two years in office.
An illustration shows US President Joe Biden surrounded by the foreign-policy issues he has faced in his first two years in office.

Biden’s Foreign-Policy Report Card

February 1, 2023 | View Now

To mark the halfway point in U.S. President Joe Biden’s first term in office, Foreign Policy asked 20 experts to grade his administration’s performance on relationships with Russia and C...Show morehina, as well as on issues such as defense, democracy, and immigration. The assessments ranged all the way from A- to a failing grade. But more broadly, is there a way to define his administration’s agenda? Is there a Biden doctrine? FP’s Ravi Agrawal spoke to experts with very different perspectives for insights. Nadia Schadlow was a deputy national security advisor in the Trump administration and is now a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute. Stephen Wertheim is a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and a longtime advocate for ending so-called forever wars. Perhaps surprisingly, Wertheim was more critical of Biden’s foreign policy—specifically on China—than was Schadlow. Is that because Biden has largely doubled down on former President Donald Trump’s China policies? Watch the interview or read the condensed transcript to find out.

See what’s trending. See what’s trending.

Most popular articles on FP right now. Most popular articles on FP right now.

Rishi Sunak reacts as he leaves 11 Downing Street, in London, on March 23, 2022.
Rishi Sunak reacts as he leaves 11 Downing Street, in London, on March 23, 2022.

Britain Is Much Worse Off Than It Understands

Things weren’t nearly this bad in the 1970s—but the country’s leaders haven't grasped that yet.

A close-up photo of Netanyahu and Putin standing face to face and smiling at each other.
A close-up photo of Netanyahu and Putin standing face to face and smiling at each other.

The Deeper Reason Netanyahu Won’t Arm Ukraine Against Russia

Jerusalem’s ties to Moscow are partly about security. They’re also about illiberalism.

An illustration of John Bolton.
An illustration of John Bolton.

The Fighter

John Bolton was once the enfant terrible of the Republican Party. Is he now its conscience?

A man petrol station advertises its prices for gasoline and diesel on May 31, 2022 in Berlin, Germany.
A man petrol station advertises its prices for gasoline and diesel on May 31, 2022 in Berlin, Germany.

EU Bans Russian Diesel

Europe is reducing its dependency on Moscow, but what will it mean for prices?

My Account