Skip to navigation Skip to search Skip to main content Skip to footer
Foreign Policy Magazine Foreign Policy Magazine
  • Sign In
  • Give a Gift Give a Gift
  • Subscribe Subscribe Upgrade Upgrade
  • Sign In
  • Latest
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Podcasts
  • The Magazine
  • Newsletters
  • FP Live
  • Events
  • FP Analytics
Search Icon

latest

What to Expect From Erdogan’s Third Term

Erdogan has two priorities: to chart a more assertive presence for Turkey and to leverage Ankara’s position inside Western institutions to make that happen.

Analysis |
Sinan Ciddi

Israel Is Officially Annexing the West Bank

A quiet bureaucratic maneuver by Netanyahu’s government has begun transferring control over the occupied territory from military to civilian leadership—violating international law.

Argument |
Michael Sfard

Can France’s Big Bucks Fill the Defense Gaps?

Paris is ramping up military spending. But critics worry it’s going to the wrong places.

Report |
Michele Barbero

India’s Deadly Train Crash Raises Safety Concerns

Amid a financing push for modern infrastructure, existing problems may go overlooked.

South Asia Brief |
Michael Kugelman
See All Stories
  • FP Events
  • FP Studios
  • FP Analytics
  • FP PeaceGames
  • Subscription Services
  • Group Subscriptions
  • Reprint Permissions
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • FP Guides – Graduate Education
  • FP For Education
  • FP Archive
  • Buy Back Issues
  • Work At FP
  • Meet the Staff
  • Advertising/Partnerships
  • Country Reports
  • Sign In
  • Give a Gift Give a Gift
  • Subscribe Subscribe Upgrade Upgrade
  • Sign In
Search Icon

: It’s Time for a U.S. Special Representative on Women, Peace and Security

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Sponsored Content

It’s Time for a U.S. Special Representative on Women, Peace and Security

By Sahana Dharmapuri, Jolynn Shoemaker, and Erin Cooper of Our Secure Future

U.S. State Department in Washington, D.C.
U.S. State Department in Washington, D.C.
U.S. State Department in Washington, D.C.

The new Biden Administration will encounter a mix of traditional and non-traditional security challenges, including authoritarian governments and state aggression, violent non-state actors, cyber threats, climate change, and human rights abuses. All of these security threats have a dimension often treated as an afterthought but is central to our security: gender equality.

The incoming Administration is revisioning security to look more like America and prioritizing critical issues, like climate change and technology policy. Establishing a Special Representative for Women, Peace and Security, would proactively address yet another strategic policy objective.

As a government, we’ve already acknowledged this reality. The Women, Peace and Security Act of 2017 (WPS Act), builds on 20 years of experience, research, and advocacy for gender equality, diversity and inclusion in security decision-making. Women, Peace and Security is a transformative policy mandate with a global constituency. It provides policymakers with the tools to end cycles of violent conflict, create more equitable peace processes, halt inequalities, and promote gender equality on a global, national, and local scale. The evolution of this global agenda demonstrates that sustainable peace and security is not possible when voices on human rights and inclusion are marginalized.

Gender equality is far more than “women’s issues” that can be brushed aside. It is closely correlated with social stability, state security, rule of law and good governance. Research has demonstrated that the way in which women are treated in a society is a harbinger of that society’s stability and propensity for violence. Using a gender perspective improves security outcomes. A gender perspective is far more than just women at the table. When projects, programs, and algorithms are designed with a gender perspective it increases our chances of success at creating sustainable peace and security for everyone.

A robust and revitalized Global Women’s Issues office in the State Department could house the Special Representative for Women, Peace and Security. The Special Representative aligns with the overarching mandate of the Global Women’s Office to promote gender equality.

The Special Representative position would report to the Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues and would give the Women, Peace and Security policy agenda the dedicated attention it deserves. The Special Representative would focus exclusively on the specific issue set of Women, Peace and Security. This would be a time-bound position to support legal and policy commitments we have made as a country through the WPS Act.

The Special Representative for Women, Peace and Security would work closely with counterparts in the National Security Council, USAID, Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security, to break down silos between portfolios that are relevant to this agenda. This is not unlike other Special Representatives with a specific role in advancing U.S. foreign policy interests, such as the Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues, the Special Representative on Nuclear Non-Proliferation, or the Special Representative on Trafficking-in-Persons.

Such a portfolio would enhance diplomatic relations with the UN, NATO, and countries that prioritize this issue set with their own Women, Peace and Security National Action Plans. The Special Representative would also be empowered to identify new and emerging security issues and to coordinate inclusive and innovative approaches that embody the Women, Peace and Security agenda. The Special Representative can be tasked with producing a 25th Anniversary Report on the State of the World on Women, Peace and Security. The report would assess American commitments on this issue set, and review the progress of other countries, identify gaps, and highlight emerging issues relevant to national security.

Establishing a Special Representative on Women, Peace and Security early in the Biden Administration will demonstrate American leadership and a commitment to the values of transparency, accountability, and equality as central to U.S. foreign policy. This will be instrumental for realizing a human rights-based vision while embodying the principles of diversity and inclusion.

 

What is Women, Peace and Security?

Now, more than ever, there is an opportunity to build on the momentum and commitments of the Women, Peace and Security agenda, as embodied in U.S. law. The Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017 (WPS Act) was a successful bipartisan effort in the midst of a deeply partisan political arena. The WPS Act mandates defense, diplomacy and development institutions to integrate a gender perspective. It requires a gender analysis in decision-making, and increasing women’s participation in foreign policy decision-making. A bi-partisan Women, Peace and Security Congressional Caucus, established in early 2020, is co-chaired by Representative Lois Frankel (D-FL) and Representative Mike Waltz (R-FL).

The U.S. law may be relatively new, but Women, Peace and Security has a much longer history. This agenda was developed by civil society, and was spearheaded by women in non-Western contexts, including countries in Africa, Latin America and Asia in reaction to violent conflict, authoritarianism, and human rights abuses.

Today, civil society efforts are underway to press for this more inclusive and peaceful approach in every region around the globe. Since the United Nations Security Council first formally recognized women’s roles in peacemaking and peacebuilding in UNSC Resolution 1325 (2000), governments and international organizations around the world have also tasked themselves with moving this agenda forward. More than 85 countries now have National Action Plans on Women, Peace and Security, and these plans involve multiple ministries spanning all aspects of governance.

U.S. agencies have been implementing this agenda since the Obama Administration, after an Executive Order on Women, Peace and Security was issued in December 2011. The work has been slow but steady, relying on individual champions and pockets of awareness across the government. But overall, very few foreign policy and national security policymakers are knowledgeable about this mandate.

Many see it as narrowly applicable to only specific conflict-affected countries. This is a missed opportunity. A Special Representative on Women, Peace and Security could examine emerging, complex and far-reaching foreign policy and national security challenges where we need much broader representation and ranges of perspectives.

 

New Frontiers for Peace and Security

One example of this is in the emerging national security and technology space. The United States is making policy decisions about the future of technology governance and innovation, and how the use of technology by malign actors will be curbed. Women and marginalized communities are experiencing systemic bias and abuse in technology leadership, creation, and use. Algorithmic bias could have widespread negative consequences for women and BIPOC communities, and gendered dynamics on tech platforms are interlinked with violence, extremism and authoritarianism. The problems show up first in women’s experiences and in the most chronically marginalized groups.

Women in politics, in particular, are the targets of overwhelming volumes of online attacks and fake stories, often aimed at framing them as untrustworthy, unintelligent, emotional or hyper-sexual. This type of disinformation is designed to alter public understanding of women politicians’ track records for immediate political gain, as well as to discourage other women from seeking political careers.

Doxxing, swatting, deepfake videos, disinformation, and other forms of cyber attacks are often first tested by extremist groups on the most marginalized groups, such as women, BIPOC, and LGBTQ+ communities, before these tactics become mainstream. This is true globally–whether the violent actors are white supremacists or Islamic fundamentalists. It is easy to test violent political narratives and agendas on marginalized communities simply because those groups are neither listened to by mainstream security actors, policymakers, nor by the private sector. It shouldn’t be a surprise — violence perpetrated on these communities is often ignored.

These new gender and security problems are not well understood within the context of U.S. foreign policy and national security policymaking.

Technology companies such as Facebook, and even small start-ups are starting to recognize many human rights and gender problems that are playing out on technology platforms. They are attempting to address these issues with interventions like ethics committees and oversight boards. Sustained and coordinated dialogue with civil society, the private sector, and government actors will be critical to address interlinkages between technology, peace and security in a holistic and gender-sensitive way.

The Special Representative could leverage these nascent good governance efforts, and bring together stakeholders to support the Women, Peace and Security agenda in these emerging policy areas. An internal advocate for a broader peace and security lens, the Special Representative would expand the range of voices at the table. This would ensure that our security policy discussions and solutions are more inclusive, effective, and forward-thinking.

This is the moment for the incoming Biden Administration to bring the principles of Women, Peace and Security into the full landscape of peace and security challenges, including violent conflict but also new and complex challenges in the digital ecosystem.

We need imagination to bridge our ideals of human rights and democracy into the reality of the new world that we are living in. The Women, Peace and Security Agenda is about norms and principles – human rights, participation, inclusion, justice – that are fundamental to our journey as a nation.

The Special Representative on Women, Peace and Security can bring together many facets of the democracy we seek to build at home and reflect the best of American leadership abroad for the sake of peace and security.

About the Authors

Sahana Dharmapuri, Director of Our Secure Future

Jolynn Shoemaker, Fellow, Our Secure Future

Erin Cooper, Women, Peace and Security Project Specialist, Our Secure Future

About Our Secure Future

Our Secure Future: Women Make the Difference (OSF) is a department of the Colorado-based One Earth Future Foundation. OSF works to strengthen the Women, Peace and Security movement to enable effective policy decision-making for a more peaceful world.

Loading graphics
Foreign Policy Magazine
Foreign Policy Magazine
  • FP Events
  • FP Studios
  • FP Analytics
  • FP PeaceGames
  • Subscription Services
  • Group Subscriptions
  • Reprint Permissions
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • FP Guides – Graduate Education
  • FP For Education
  • FP Archive
  • Buy Back Issues
  • Work At FP
  • Meet the Staff
  • Advertising/Partnerships
  • Country Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
Powered by WordPress VIP
© 2023, Graham Digital Holding Company

Welcome to a world of insight.

Make the most of FP.

Explore the benefits of your FP subscription. Explore the benefits included in your subscription.

Stay updated on the topics you care about with email alerts. Sign up below. Stay updated on the topics you care about with email alerts. Sign up below.

Choose a few newsletters that interest you. Get more insight in your inbox.

Here are some we think you might like. Update your newsletter preferences.

  • World Brief thumbnail

    Your guide to the most important world stories of the day.

  • Africa Brief thumbnail

    Essential analysis of the stories shaping geopolitics on the continent. Delivered Wednesday.

  • Latin America Brief thumbnail

    One-stop digest of politics, economics, and culture. Delivered Friday.

  • China Brief thumbnail

    The latest news, analysis, and data from the country each week. Delivered Wednesday.

  • South Asia Brief thumbnail

    Weekly update on developments in India and its neighbors. Delivered Thursday.

  • Situation Report thumbnail

    Weekly update on what’s driving U.S. national security policy. Delivered Thursday.

  • A curated selection of our very best long reads. Delivered Wednesday & Sunday.

  • Evening roundup with our editors’ favorite stories of the day. Delivered Monday-Saturday.

  • A monthly digest of the top articles read by FP subscribers.

Keep up with the world without stopping yours. Keep up with the world without stopping yours.

Download the FP mobile app to read anytime, anywhere. Download the new FP mobile app to read anytime, anywhere.

Download on the App Store
  • Read the magazine
  • Save articles (and read offline)
  • Customize your feed
  • Listen to FP podcasts
Download on the Apple App Store
Download on the Google Play Store

Analyze the world’s biggest events. Analyze the world’s biggest events.

Join in-depth conversations and interact with foreign-policy experts with FP Live logo Join in-depth conversations and interact with foreign-policy experts with FP Live logo

US-China-Tech-Wars-Dan-Wang-FPLive-Site-1500x100
US-China-Tech-Wars-Dan-Wang-FPLive-Site-1500x100

Inside the U.S.-China Tech War

June 20, 2023  |  11:00am ET
Register now Ask a Question Ask a Question
✓  

Registered

  |   Ask a Question Ask a Question   |   Add to Calendar
  1. Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

    Subscribe

    ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN

  2. Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

    Subscribe

    ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN

Over the last few years, the United States has moved to limit China’s technological rise. U.S.-led sanctions have imposed unprecedented limits on Beijing’s access to advanced computing c...Show morehips. In response, China has accelerated its own efforts to develop its technological industry and reduce its dependence on external imports.  According to Dan Wang, a technology expert and visiting scholar at Yale Law School’s Paul Tsai China Center, China’s tech competitiveness is grounded in manufacturing capabilities. And sometimes China’s strategy beats America’s.  Where is this new tech war headed? How are other countries being impacted as a result? In what ways are they reassessing their relationships with the world’s largest economic superpowers? Join FP’s Ravi Agrawal in conversation with Wang for a discussion about China’s technological rise and whether U.S. actions can really stop it. 

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 24: U.S. President Joe Biden (R) and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi participate in a bilateral meeting in the Oval Office of the White House on September 24, 2021 in Washington, DC. President Biden is hosting a Quad Leaders Summit later today with Prime Minister Modi, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison and Japanese Prime Minister Suga Yoshihide. (Photo by Sarahbeth Maney-Pool/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 24: U.S. President Joe Biden (R) and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi participate in a bilateral meeting in the Oval Office of the White House on September 24, 2021 in Washington, DC. President Biden is hosting a Quad Leaders Summit later today with Prime Minister Modi, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison and Japanese Prime Minister Suga Yoshihide. (Photo by Sarahbeth Maney-Pool/Getty Images)

Is America Making a Bad Bet on India?

June 21, 2023  |  12:00pm ET
Subscribe Ask a Question Ask a Question
  1. Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

    Subscribe

    ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN

  2. Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

    Subscribe

    ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN

For decades, the U.S. foreign-policy establishment has made the assumption that India could serve as a partner as the United States jostles with China for power in the Indo-Pacific region. B...Show moreut Ashley J. Tellis, a longtime watcher of U.S.-India relations, says that Washington’s expectations of New Delhi are misplaced.  In a widely read Foreign Affairs essay, Tellis makes the case that the White House should recalibrate its expectations of India. Is Tellis right?  Send in your questions for an in-depth discussion with Tellis and FP Live host Ravi Agrawal ahead of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the White House on June 22.  

US-Europe-China-FPLive-site-3-2
US-Europe-China-FPLive-site-3-2

Are America and Europe Aligned on China?

June 7, 2023 | View Now

Last weekend, spy chiefs and defense officials from around the world descended on Singapore to attend the Shangri-La Dialogue, Asia’s biggest annual security conference. The U.S. delegatio...Show moren was led by Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, who asked for a bilateral meeting with China’s new defense minister, Li Shangfu. The request was denied, perhaps in part because Li has been sanctioned by Washington for his role in the purchase of military equipment from Moscow. Over the course of the three-day summit, which I attended, Li and Austin didn’t speak with each other; they spoke at each other. In dueling speeches, Austin summoned the usual Washington buzzwords—a “free and open Indo-Pacific”—and made the point that talks with China were necessary, not a bargaining chip. When Li’s turn came, he responded with familiar Beijing-speak, criticizing Western hypocrisy and Washington’s growing security partnerships in Asia. But while China shut the United States out, it welcomed talks with Europe. EU foreign-policy chief Josep Borrell, German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius, and British Defense Secretary Ben Wallace all secured bilateral meetings with China’s Li. The Singapore summit underscored how the U.S.-China relationship was different from that of Europe’s relationship with China, its biggest trading partner. But what is the substance of those differences, and will Beijing try to exploit them? For answers, FP’s Ravi Agrawal spoke to Cindy Yu, an assistant editor at the Spectator and the host of its Chinese Whispers podcast, and James Palmer, the writer of FP’s weekly China Brief newsletter. FP subscribers can watch the full discussion or read an edited and condensed transcript, exclusive to FP Insiders.

See what’s trending. See what’s trending.

Most popular articles on FP right now. Most popular articles on FP right now.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich attend a press conference at the prime minister's office in Jerusalem on Jan. 25.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich attend a press conference at the prime minister's office in Jerusalem on Jan. 25.

Israel Is Officially Annexing the West Bank

A quiet bureaucratic maneuver by Netanyahu’s government has begun transferring control over the occupied territory from military to civilian leadership—violating international law.

A Swedish soldier takes part in a NATO military exercise called Baltops 22 in the Stockholm archipelago.
A Swedish soldier takes part in a NATO military exercise called Baltops 22 in the Stockholm archipelago.

Sweden Pushes to Fast-Track Delayed NATO Bid

NATO is revamping defense plans that will be a whole lot harder to execute with Sweden on the outside.

Erdogan and his cabinet members walk toward the camera with the mausoleum looming in the background.
Erdogan and his cabinet members walk toward the camera with the mausoleum looming in the background.

What to Expect From Erdogan’s Third Term

Erdogan has two priorities: to chart a more assertive presence for Turkey and to leverage Ankara’s position inside Western institutions to make that happen.

French President Emmanuel Macron visits the Mont-de-Marsan Air Base in southwestern France to deliver his New Year address to the French Army.
French President Emmanuel Macron visits the Mont-de-Marsan Air Base in southwestern France to deliver his New Year address to the French Army.

Can France’s Big Bucks Fill the Defense Gaps?

Paris is ramping up military spending. But critics worry it’s going to the wrong places.

My Account