Skip to navigation Skip to search Skip to main content Skip to footer
Foreign Policy Magazine Foreign Policy Magazine
  • Sign In
  • Give a Gift Give a Gift
  • Subscribe Subscribe Upgrade Upgrade
  • Sign In
  • Latest
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Podcasts
  • The Magazine
  • Newsletters
  • FP Live
  • Events
  • FP Analytics
Search Icon

latest

Ukrainian U.N. Ambassador: Russia Is ‘Mold That Invades Your House’

Sergiy Kyslytsya talks about Putin’s nuclear blackmail, what to do with the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, and how even Henry Kissinger can learn.

Insider |
J. Alex Tarquinio

K-Culture Is Here to Stay

South Korea’s unique conditions make it an entertainment giant.

Argument |
Steve Chung

The Indo-Pacific Has Already Chosen Door No. 3

So-called fence-sitters are rejecting zero-sum geopolitical binaries in favor of multi-alignment.

Argument |
Kelly A. Grieco, Jennifer Kavanagh

The Stans Can’t Play Both Sides Anymore

As Russia and China grow closer, Central Asian leaders don’t have as much leverage—or independence—as they once did.

Raffaello Pantucci, Alessandro Arduino
See All Stories
  • FP Events
  • FP Studios
  • FP Analytics
  • FP PeaceGames
  • Subscription Services
  • Group Subscriptions
  • Reprint Permissions
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • FP Guides – Graduate Education
  • FP For Education
  • FP Archive
  • Buy Back Issues
  • Work At FP
  • Meet the Staff
  • Advertising/Partnerships
  • Country Reports
  • Sign In
  • Give a Gift Give a Gift
  • Subscribe Subscribe Upgrade Upgrade
  • Sign In
Search Icon

: The Dark Side of Democracy

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Sponsored Content

The Dark Side of Democracy

Why the world needs to act now to tackle the threat of dark money in politics.

By Katherine Ellena and Erica Shein

Piggy bank on dark blue black background
Piggy bank on dark blue black background

We need to talk about the dark side of money in politics. Dirty money. Foreign money. Illicit, opaque, crypto, gray, and black.

We need to talk about this murky spectrum, because it wreaks havoc on our democracies. In recent weeks the U.S., the E.U., and others have acted against Russian financial interests, including sanctioning oligarchs who have enriched themselves on the country’s resources and whose fealty to the state has enabled its aggression. But it will require a concerted re-orientation of the global community of democracies to address the corruption threats we all face.

The corruption problem that threatens democracy is more vast than illicit finance in elections, but this is often the gateway to more pervasive political corruption. The consent of the governed—established through credible elections—is the foundation of democracy. If elections are merely a currency to manipulate at will, this foundation collapses. It is unsurprising then that political corruption fuels foreign malign influence and the entrenchment of autocrats. And its consequences do not stop there. In a recent Foreign Policy Virtual Dialogue held in partnership with IFES, Bill Browder—whose advocacy led to the U.S.’s adoption of the Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act—noted that “everything about kleptocracy and corruption” leads to terrible violence and repression. If we are serious about protecting our democracies—as the people of Ukraine are doing with their lives—we must recognize and address this problem alongside democracy’s other discontents.

This is more easily said than done. Even the most clear-cut forms of illicit funding or spending in elections are hard to tackle. More than 88 percent of countries have banned vote buying, for example, yet prosecution of offenders is uncommon. The reasons are manifold: intense sensitivity around “political” allegations, the high standard of evidence required for conviction, and the long timeframe for criminal proceedings. Potential civil penalties or injunctions are also underutilized. As a result, corrupt behavior goes unpunished—and democracy suffers.

If these more straightforward acts of corruption in the electoral process are difficult to address, then we face a far greater challenge in addressing the myriad ways in which elections can be threatened by corruption, both inside and outside a country. Four of these methods are worth examining in more detail.

First, criminal groups instrumentalize elections to launder illicit funds and to support politicians who will permit them to continue to operate with impunity. In Central America, for example, such “dirty money” (money obtained illegally) in campaign finance is recognized as an endemic problem that results in a marriage of organized crime and politics that is difficult to unravel.

Second, foreign interests funnel money across borders and into political campaigns. The Alliance for Securing Democracy has extensively documented the pollutant effect of dark money (political funding where the source and any intermediary donors are unknown) across 33 countries in the past decade. This includes the United States, where lacunae in the regulatory framework and insufficient oversight resources have until recently created a permissive environment for “black hole money.” In Australia, the specter of dark money has emerged ahead of 2022 elections, with fingers pointing back to China.

Third, malicious actors fund sophisticated online disinformation campaigns and political advertising masquerading as genuine content. As our colleagues have noted in Counteringdisinformation.org, such campaigns are “supercharged” by networks with deep bank accounts. Globally, there are few regulatory guardrails to prevent illicit sponsorship of online influence activities. A European Commission report has documented information manipulation in political processes across the EU that is connected to malicious foreign state and non-state actors. Following the 2016 U.S. election, a grand jury indictment of Russians with ties to the Kremlin revealed a campaign of paid internet advertising that manufactured controversies to influence the election outcome.

Fourth, cryptocurrency political donations and non-fungible tokens (NFTs) open new avenues for corruption in elections. The volume of cryptocurrency transactions globally has exploded in recent years, though illicit crypto transactions are estimated at $14 billion, a drop in the sea of illicit physical currency. What constitutes “illicit” transactions in this sphere is largely undefined, however, and the alacrity and sophistication of malign actors is likely to vastly outpace the ability of democratic actors to respond to them. It would be dangerous to ignore the potential impact of unregulated cryptocurrency and its digital kin on democratic elections.

 

Across these complex issues, skewed incentives of policymakers present a significant barrier to change.

 

Political and campaign finance regulation is fraught, as it threatens the resources—and viability—of parties and candidates across the political spectrum.

Heightened regulation also limits options for autocrats to hide corrupt patronage networks, which they will go to great lengths to protect. When the International Commission Against Impunity in Guatemala accelerated its investigation of dirty money in politics, backlash from political elites intensified, and the investigative body was ultimately dissolved. As the Council on Foreign Relations noted, “That alone should be proof of how much influence the corrupt stand to lose through thorough campaign finance reform.”

Weak regulation or blocked reform at the national level is mirrored by porous international frameworks that have not kept pace with proliferating threats. As IFES has previously observed, the U.N. Convention Against Corruption does not explicitly recognize the specific risks posed by election-related corrupt conduct. And while the June 2021 U.N. General Assembly Political Declaration finally acknowledged the importance of protecting election integrity as a corruption prevention measure, the declaration focuses on transparency in political funding as the primary solution—offering merely an umbrella in the face of a hurricane.

So, what more can be done? Concerted—and non-self-interested—action is needed at the national, regional, and international levels to turn off the spigot of money that corrupts democracy.

We need greater transparency to eradicate the influence of dark money on elections. This includes transparency on where money is coming from, how it moves, and where it lands.

We need more sophisticated sanctioning power to prevent dirty money from leaking into political processes.This means both injunctive and punitive sanctioning power against criminal actors for not only their extractive behavior (acquiring and laundering ill-gotten gains) but also their investment behavior (directing those gains into the corruption of elections).

We need strengthened regulatory regimes that unravel domestic elections from foreign purse strings. This requires meaningful legal prohibitions—and enforcement capability—at the national level that encompasses governments, individuals, firms, and other third parties. But domestic effort could be bolstered by regulatory action at the regional and global level that creates new norms around foreign funding in elections—something currently being considered by the European Parliament.

 

We need to match the imagination and ambition of bad actors who will seek to use the new crypto frontier for undemocratic political gain.

 

On March 9, President Biden signed an executive order that includes a directive to “mitigate the illicit finance and national security risks posed by the illicit use of digital assets.” Illicit financing in elections and politics darkens our democracies, and it should receive attention commensurate to that threat.

The breadth of recent sanctions and regulatory actions against the Russian regime, its banks, and its oligarchs—and the speed at which they have been put in place—has finally turned ripples into waves of action against corrupt networks. These actions must not stop here, but extend into new domestic and global frameworks that raise the costs of corruption for kleptocrats and incentivize good governance—protecting our democracies from not only the aggressions of autocratic neighbors and foes, but also the would-be autocrats within.

 

Katherine Ellena is Director of the Center for Anti-Corruption & Democratic Trust, and Erica Shein is Director of the Center for Applied Research and Learning, both part of the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES).

Loading graphics
Foreign Policy Magazine
Foreign Policy Magazine
  • FP Events
  • FP Studios
  • FP Analytics
  • FP PeaceGames
  • Subscription Services
  • Group Subscriptions
  • Reprint Permissions
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • FP Guides – Graduate Education
  • FP For Education
  • FP Archive
  • Buy Back Issues
  • Work At FP
  • Meet the Staff
  • Advertising/Partnerships
  • Country Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
Powered by WordPress VIP
© 2023, Graham Digital Holding Company

Welcome to a world of insight.

Make the most of FP.

Explore the benefits of your FP subscription. Explore the benefits included in your subscription.

Stay updated on the topics you care about with email alerts. Sign up below. Stay updated on the topics you care about with email alerts. Sign up below.

Choose a few newsletters that interest you. Get more insight in your inbox.

Here are some we think you might like. Update your newsletter preferences.

  • World Brief thumbnail

    Your guide to the most important world stories of the day.

  • Africa Brief thumbnail

    Essential analysis of the stories shaping geopolitics on the continent. Delivered Wednesday.

  • Latin America Brief thumbnail

    One-stop digest of politics, economics, and culture. Delivered Friday.

  • China Brief thumbnail

    The latest news, analysis, and data from the country each week. Delivered Wednesday.

  • South Asia Brief thumbnail

    Weekly update on developments in India and its neighbors. Delivered Thursday.

  • Situation Report thumbnail

    Weekly update on what’s driving U.S. national security policy. Delivered Thursday.

  • A curated selection of our very best long reads. Delivered Wednesday & Sunday.

  • Evening roundup with our editors’ favorite stories of the day. Delivered Monday-Saturday.

  • A monthly digest of the top articles read by FP subscribers.

Keep up with the world without stopping yours. Keep up with the world without stopping yours.

Download the FP mobile app to read anytime, anywhere. Download the new FP mobile app to read anytime, anywhere.

Download on the App Store
  • Read the magazine
  • Save articles (and read offline)
  • Customize your feed
  • Listen to FP podcasts
Download on the Apple App Store
Download on the Google Play Store

Analyze the world’s biggest events. Analyze the world’s biggest events.

Join in-depth conversations and interact with foreign-policy experts with FP Live logo Join in-depth conversations and interact with foreign-policy experts with FP Live logo

AlondraNelson-FPLive-Site-1500x100
AlondraNelson-FPLive-Site-1500x100

How Governments Should Manage the Rise of AI

June 1, 2023  |  11:00am ET
Register now Ask a Question Ask a Question
✓  

Registered

  |   Ask a Question Ask a Question   |   Add to Calendar
  1. Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

    Subscribe

    ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN

  2. Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

    Subscribe

    ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN

Is the White House prepared to deal with the remarkable growth of artificial intelligence? What are the current and potential risks to Americans? If governments should create rules around th...Show moree regulation of AI, what considerations should guide the creation of those rules? Alondra Nelson is the architect of the White House’s “Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights.” Since it was published in October, AI has only become more central to our lives—and Nelson has stepped down from her role as the government’s head of science and technology.  How should policymakers think through the challenges presented by AI? Join Nelson for a wide-ranging discussion with FP’s Ravi Agrawal. 

US-Europe-China-FPLive-site-3-2
US-Europe-China-FPLive-site-3-2

Are America and Europe Aligned on China?

June 7, 2023  |  11:00am ET
Register now Ask a Question Ask a Question
✓  

Registered

  |   Ask a Question Ask a Question   |   Add to Calendar
  1. Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

    Subscribe

    ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN

  2. Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

    Subscribe

    ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN

The war in Ukraine has propelled the United States and Europe closer on a variety of foreign-policy issues. But do Washington and Brussels agree on how to deal with Beijing’s growing clout...Show more?  The signs are mixed. The trans-Atlantic alliance NATO has formally declared China a strategic threat, but there are also emerging gaps in how various European capitals and Washington want to engage with Beijing. What exactly are these differences, and how will they impact the world’s relations with China? Join FP’s Ravi Agrawal for a discussion with experts on both sides of the Atlantic: Cindy Yu, an assistant editor of the Spectator and host of its podcast Chinese Whispers; and James Palmer, author of FP’s weekly China Brief newsletter. FP subscribers can send in their questions in advance. 

US-China-Tech-Wars-Dan-Wang-FPLive-Site-1500x100
US-China-Tech-Wars-Dan-Wang-FPLive-Site-1500x100

Inside the U.S.-China Tech War

June 20, 2023  |  11:00am ET
Register now Ask a Question Ask a Question
✓  

Registered

  |   Ask a Question Ask a Question   |   Add to Calendar
  1. Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

    Subscribe

    ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN

  2. Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

    Subscribe

    ALREADY AN FP SUBSCRIBER? LOGIN

Over the last few years, the United States has moved to limit China’s technological rise. U.S.-led sanctions have imposed unprecedented limits on Beijing’s access to advanced computing c...Show morehips. In response, China has accelerated its own efforts to develop its technological industry and reduce its dependence on external imports.  According to Dan Wang, a technology expert and visiting scholar at Yale Law School’s Paul Tsai China Center, China’s tech competitiveness is grounded in manufacturing capabilities. And sometimes China’s strategy beats America’s.  Where is this new tech war headed? How are other countries being impacted as a result? In what ways are they reassessing their relationships with the world’s largest economic superpowers? Join FP’s Ravi Agrawal in conversation with Wang for a discussion about China’s technological rise and whether U.S. actions can really stop it. 

See what’s trending. See what’s trending.

Most popular articles on FP right now. Most popular articles on FP right now.

A visitor looks at a lighted map of Chinese pipelines at the China International Energy Saving, Emissions Reduction, and New Energy Science & Technology Expo in Beijing.
A visitor looks at a lighted map of Chinese pipelines at the China International Energy Saving, Emissions Reduction, and New Energy Science & Technology Expo in Beijing.

Stop Worrying About Chinese Hegemony in Asia

U.S. fears are not only irrational—they’re a potential self-fulfilling prophecy.

A row of statues of German political thinker Karl Marx.
A row of statues of German political thinker Karl Marx.

Gen Z Has Finally Found Its Karl Marx

The German philosopher’s “Grundrisse” is an indispensable guide to our current chaos—from AI to the rise of China.

Permanent Representative of Ukraine to the United Nations Sergiy Kyslytsya speaks during a United Nations General Assembly special session at the U.N. headquarters on Oct. 10, 2022.
Permanent Representative of Ukraine to the United Nations Sergiy Kyslytsya speaks during a United Nations General Assembly special session at the U.N. headquarters on Oct. 10, 2022.

Ukrainian U.N. Ambassador: Russia Is ‘Mold That Invades Your House’

Sergiy Kyslytsya talks about Putin’s nuclear blackmail, what to do with the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, and how even Henry Kissinger can learn.

South Korean actor Song Kang-ho poses during a photo call for the film "Cobweb" at the 76th edition of the Cannes Film Festival in Cannes, France.
South Korean actor Song Kang-ho poses during a photo call for the film "Cobweb" at the 76th edition of the Cannes Film Festival in Cannes, France.

K-Culture Is Here to Stay

South Korea’s unique conditions make it an entertainment giant.

My Account